paper-with-me

Papers

Decoding surface codes with deep reinforcement learning and probabilistic policy reuse

2022-12-22 · Elisha Siddiqui Matekole, Esther Ye, Ramya Iyer, Samuel Yen-Chi Chen

Quantum computing (QC) promises significant advantages on certain hard computational tasks over classical computers. However, current quantum hardware, also known as noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers (NISQ), are still unable to carry out computations faithfully mainly because of the lack of quantum error correction (QEC) capability. A significant amount of theoretical studies have provided various types of QEC codes; one of the notable topological codes is the surface code, and its features, such as the requirement of only nearest-neighboring two-qubit control gates and a large error threshold, make it a leading candidate for scalable quantum computation. Recent developments of machine learning (ML)-based techniques especially the reinforcement learning (RL) methods have been applied to the decoding problem and have already made certain progress. Nevertheless, the device noise pattern may change over time, making trained decoder models ineffective. In this paper, we propose a continual reinforcement learning method to address these decoding challenges. Specifically, we implement double deep Q-learning with probabilistic policy reuse (DDQN-PPR) model to learn surface code decoding strategies for quantum environments with varying noise patterns. Through numerical simulations, we show that the proposed DDQN-PPR model can significantly reduce the computational complexity. Moreover, increasing the number of trained policies can further improve the agent's performance. Our results open a way to build more capable RL agents which can leverage previously gained knowledge to tackle QEC challenges.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2212.11890

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Deep Reinforcement LearningQ-Learningreinforcement-learningReinforcement Learning (RL)

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Q-Learning Q-Learning is an off-policy temporal difference control algorithm: $$Q\left(S\_{t}, A\_{t}\right) \leftarrow Q\left(S\_{t}, A\_{t}\right) + \alpha\left[R_{t+1} +…

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Reinforcement Learning Decoders for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation

2018-10-16 · Ryan Sweke, Markus S. Kesselring, Evert P. L. van Nieuwenburg, Jens Eisert

Topological error correcting codes, and particularly the surface code, currently provide the most feasible roadmap towards large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computation. As such, obtaining fast and flexible decoding alg…

reinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)

RELDEC: Reinforcement Learning-Based Decoding of Moderate Length LDPC Codes

2021-12-27 · Salman Habib, Allison Beemer, Joerg Kliewer

In this work we propose RELDEC, a novel approach for sequential decoding of moderate length low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. The main idea behind RELDEC is that an optimized decoding policy is subsequently obtained…

Meta Reinforcement Learningreinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)+1

A scalable and fast artificial neural network syndrome decoder for surface codes

2021-10-12 · Spiro Gicev, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg, Muhammad Usman

Surface code error correction offers a highly promising pathway to achieve scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing. When operated as stabilizer codes, surface code computations consist of a syndrome decoding step where…

Decoder

A scalable and real-time neural decoder for topological quantum codes

2025-12-08 · Andrew W. Senior, Thomas Edlich, Francisco J. H. Heras, Lei M. Zhang 외 arxiv

Fault-tolerant quantum computing will require error rates far below those achievable with physical qubits. Quantum error correction (QEC) bridges this gap, but depends on decoders being simultaneously fast, accurate, and…

ReST-RL: Achieving Accurate Code Reasoning of LLMs with Optimized Self-Training and Decoding

2025-08-27 · Sining Zhoubian, Dan Zhang, Jie Tang arxiv

With respect to improving the reasoning accuracy of LLMs, the representative reinforcement learning (RL) method GRPO faces failure due to insignificant reward variance, while verification methods based on process reward …

Reinforcement Learning