paper-with-me

Papers

Deep Transfer Learning Based Peer Review Aggregation and Meta-review Generation for Scientific Articles

2024-10-05 · Md. Tarek Hasan, Mohammad Nazmush Shamael, H. M. Mutasim Billah, Arifa Akter, Md Al Emran Hossain, Sumayra Islam, Salekul Islam, Swakkhar Shatabda

Peer review is the quality assessment of a manuscript by one or more peer experts. Papers are submitted by the authors to scientific venues, and these papers must be reviewed by peers or other authors. The meta-reviewers then gather the peer reviews, assess them, and create a meta-review and decision for each manuscript. As the number of papers submitted to these venues has grown in recent years, it becomes increasingly challenging for meta-reviewers to collect these peer evaluations on time while still maintaining the quality that is the primary goal of meta-review creation. In this paper, we address two peer review aggregation challenges a meta-reviewer faces: paper acceptance decision-making and meta-review generation. Firstly, we propose to automate the process of acceptance decision prediction by applying traditional machine learning algorithms. We use pre-trained word embedding techniques BERT to process the reviews written in natural language text. For the meta-review generation, we propose a transfer learning model based on the T5 model. Experimental results show that BERT is more effective than the other word embedding techniques, and the recommendation score is an important feature for the acceptance decision prediction. In addition, we figure out that fine-tuned T5 outperforms other inference models. Our proposed system takes peer reviews and other relevant features as input to produce a meta-review and make a judgment on whether or not the paper should be accepted. In addition, experimental results show that the acceptance decision prediction system of our task outperforms the existing models, and the meta-review generation task shows significantly improved scores compared to the existing models. For the statistical test, we utilize the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to assess whether there is a statistically significant improvement between paired observations.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2410.04202

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

ArticlesReview GenerationTransfer Learning

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Gated Linear Unit A Gated Linear Unit, or GLU computes: $$ \mathrm{GLU}(a, b) = a \otimes \sigma(b) $$ It is used in natural language processing architectures, for example the Gated CNN,…
Refunds@Expedia|||How do I get a full refund from Expedia? “How do I get a full refund from Expedia? How do I get a full refund from Expedia? – Call ☎️ +1-(888) 829 (0881) or +1-805-330-4056 or +1-805-330-4056 for Quick Help &…
Attention 설명 없음
BPE Byte Pair Encoding, or BPE, is a subword segmentation algorithm that encodes rare and unknown words as sequences of subword units. The intuition is that various word…
Layer Normalization Unlike batch normalization, Layer Normalization directly estimates the normalization statistics from the summed inputs…
Inverse Square Root Schedule Inverse Square Root is a learning rate schedule 1 / $\sqrt{\max\left(n, k\right)}$ where $n$ is the current training iteration and $k$ is the number of warm-up steps. This…
Dense Connections Dense Connections, or Fully Connected Connections, are a type of layer in a deep neural network that use a linear operation where every input is connected to every output…
Adam 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

MOPRD: A multidisciplinary open peer review dataset

2022-12-09 · Jialiang Lin, Jiaxin Song, Zhangping Zhou, Yidong Chen 외

Open peer review is a growing trend in academic publications. Public access to peer review data can benefit both the academic and publishing communities. It also serves as a great support to studies on review comment gen…

Comment GenerationReview Generation

Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future

2026-04-30 · Sihong Wu, Owen Jiang, Yilun Zhao, Tiansheng Hu 외 arxiv

Peer review is a multi-stage process involving reviews, rebuttals, meta-reviews, final decisions, and subsequent manuscript revisions. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have motivated methods that assist or…

Argument Mining Driven Analysis of Peer-Reviews

2020-12-10 · Michael Fromm, Evgeniy Faerman, Max Berrendorf, Siddharth Bhargava 외

Peer reviewing is a central process in modern research and essential for ensuring high quality and reliability of published work. At the same time, it is a time-consuming process and increasing interest in emerging field…

Argument MiningOpen-Ended Question Answering

Do LLMs Favor LLMs? Quantifying Interaction Effects in Peer Review

2026-01-28 · Vibhhu Sharma, Thorsten Joachims, Sarah Dean arxiv

There are increasing indications that LLMs are not only used for producing scientific papers, but also as part of the peer review process. In this work, we provide the first comprehensive analysis of LLM use across the p…

Calibrated Generative AI as Meta-Reviewer: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Discourse Analysis of Reviews of Peer Reviews

2025-09-18 · Gabriela C. Zapata, Bill Cope, Mary Kalantzis, Duane Searsmith arxiv

This study investigates the use of generative AI to support formative assessment through machine generated reviews of peer reviews in graduate online courses in a public university in the United States. Drawing on System…