Demolishing Searle's Chinese Room
Searle's Chinese Room argument is refuted by showing that he has actually given two different versions of the room, which fail for different reasons. Hence, Searle does not achieve his stated goal of showing ``that a system could have input and output capabilities that duplicated those of a native Chinese speaker and still not understand Chinese''.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Translating a Language You Don't Know In the Chinese Room
In a corruption of John Searle{'}s famous AI thought experiment, the Chinese Room (Searle, 1980), we twist its original intent by enabling humans to translate text, e.g. from Uyghur to English, even if they don{'}t have …
Domain AdaptationLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingMachine Translation+2Visual Room 2.0: Seeing is Not Understanding for MLLMs
Can multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) truly understand what they can see? Extending Searle's Chinese Room into the multi-modal domain, this paper proposes the Visual Room argument: MLLMs may describe every visual…
Scene UnderstandingAre MLMs Trapped in the Visual Room?
Can multi-modal large models (MLMs) that can ``see'' an image be said to ``understand'' it? Drawing inspiration from Searle's Chinese Room, we propose the \textbf{Visual Room} argument: a system may process and describe …
The Information-theoretic and Algorithmic Approach to Human, Animal and Artificial Cognition
We survey concepts at the frontier of research connecting artificial, animal and human cognition to computation and information processing---from the Turing test to Searle's Chinese Room argument, from Integrated Informa…
On modelling the emergence of logical thinking
Recent progress in machine learning techniques have revived interest in building artificial general intelligence using these particular tools. There has been a tremendous success in applying them for narrow intellectual …