paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Demystifying the Mythos or Disrupting Bugonomics? From Zero-Day Asymmetry to Defender Remediation Throughput

2026-05-23 · Alfredo Pesoli, Herman Errico, Lorenzo Cavallaro arxiv

Recent demonstrations of large language models producing candidate and confirmed vulnerabilities in production software have renewed the narrative that AI will reshape offensive and defensive security. Headlines emphasize capability; they rarely interrogate costs and incentives. This paper examines LLM-driven vulnerability discovery through a bugonomics lens: the operational economics of producing, proving, prioritizing, and fixing security-relevant defects. Historically, the most visible high-end bugonomics was offense-priced because production-grade zero-days and exploit chains were expensive specialist outputs for governments, brokers, and offensive vendors. Defender-side bugonomics already existed in vulnerability research, reward programs, and vendor remediation work; LLM-assisted systems change its scale and distribution. They make candidate generation, code comprehension, harness construction, proof-of-impact drafting, and report preparation cheaper at codebase scale. Exploits and proofs of concept remain important, but in defender workflows they primarily prove impact, guide prioritization, and justify remediation. The resulting bottleneck is not only finding more bugs; it is absorbing, validating, triaging, patching, and shipping a larger stream of reports. Using public data from Anthropic's Mythos Preview and Mozilla Firefox collaborations, along with public exploit-market price anchors and vulnerability reward programs, we argue that the near-term shift is not simply more zero-days. It is a move toward broader defender remediation throughput: low-signal candidates become cheaper, evidence-rich remediation become more important, and scarce capacity shifts toward maintainer review and release work. The effect is acute in open source, where LLM-assisted discovery can increase report volume while maintainer-side validation, triage, funding, and release capacity may not scale.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.24632

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Evaluating whether AI models would sabotage AI safety research

2026-04-27 · Robert Kirk, Alexandra Souly, Kai Fronsdal, Abby D'Cruz 외 arxiv

We evaluate the propensity of frontier models to sabotage or refuse to assist with safety research when deployed as AI research agents within a frontier AI company. We apply two complementary evaluations to four Claude m…

Benchmarking Mythos-Linked Bug Rediscovery

2026-05-17 · Isaac David, Arthur Gervais arxiv

Anthropic's April 2026 Mythos materials combine benchmark claims with concrete bug-finding stories across OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Linux, FFmpeg, and browsers. This paper reports a controlled target-file rediscovery experiment …

AI Security Policy Should Assess Systems, Not Only Models

2026-05-10 · Michael A. Riegler, Inga Strümke arxiv

We present swarm-attack, an open-source adversarial testing framework in which multiple lightweight LLM agents coordinate through shared memory, parallel exploration, and evolutionary optimization. Together, our results …

Mythos and the Unverified Cage: Z3-Based Pre-Deployment Verification for Frontier-Model Sandbox Infrastructure

2026-04-22 · Dominik Blain arxiv

The April 2026 Claude Mythos sandbox escape exposed a critical weakness in frontier AI containment: the infrastructure surrounding advanced models remains susceptible to formally characterizable arithmetic vulnerabilitie…

Demystifying AlphaGo Zero as AlphaGo GAN

2017-11-24 · Xiao Dong, Jiasong Wu, Ling Zhou

The astonishing success of AlphaGo Zero\cite{Silver_AlphaGo} invokes a worldwide discussion of the future of our human society with a mixed mood of hope, anxiousness, excitement and fear. We try to dymystify AlphaGo Zero…