Deontic Argumentation
We address the issue of defining a semantics for deontic argumentation that supports weak permission. Some recent results show that grounded semantics do not support weak permission when there is a conflict between two obligations. We provide a definition of Deontic Argumentation Theory that accounts for weak permission, and we recall the result about grounded semantics. Then, we propose a new semantics that supports weak permission.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Stable Normative Explanations: From Argumentation to Deontic Logic
This paper examines how a notion of stable explanation developed elsewhere in Defeasible Logic can be expressed in the context of formal argumentation. With this done, we discuss the deontic meaning of this reconstructio…
Explaining Non-monotonic Normative Reasoning using Argumentation Theory with Deontic Logic
In our previous research, we provided a reasoning system (called LeSAC) based on argumentation theory to provide legal support to designers during the design process. Building on this, this paper explores how to provide …
Autonomous DrivingvalidAutomated Reasoning in Deontic Logic
Deontic logic is a very well researched branch of mathematical logic and philosophy. Various kinds of deontic logics are discussed for different application domains like argumentation theory, legal reasoning, and acts in…
Legal ReasoningPhilosophyAutomated Reasoning for Robot Ethics
Deontic logic is a very well researched branch of mathematical logic and philosophy. Various kinds of deontic logics are considered for different application domains like argumentation theory, legal reasoning, and acts i…
EthicsLegal ReasoningPhilosophyWeak Permission is not Well-Founded, Grounded and Stable
We consider the notion of weak permission as the failure to conclude that the opposite obligation. We investigate the issue from the point of non-monotonic reasoning, specifically logic programming and structured argumen…