Depth-bounded Epistemic Logic
Epistemic logics model how agents reason about their beliefs and the beliefs of other agents. Existing logics typically assume the ability of agents to reason perfectly about propositions of unbounded modal depth. We present DBEL, an extension of S5 that models agents that can reason about epistemic formulas only up to a specific modal depth. To support explicit reasoning about agent depths, DBEL includes depth atoms Ead (agent a has depth exactly d) and Pad (agent a has depth at least d). We provide a sound and complete axiomatization of DBEL. We extend DBEL to support public announcements for bounded depth agents and show how the resulting DPAL logic generalizes standard axioms from public announcement logic. We present two alternate extensions and identify two undesirable properties, amnesia and knowledge leakage, that these extensions have but DPAL does not. We provide axiomatizations of these logics as well as complexity results for satisfiability and model checking. Finally, we use these logics to illustrate how agents with bounded modal depth reason in the classical muddy children problem, including upper and lower bounds on the depth knowledge necessary for agents to successfully solve the problem.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Depth-Bounded Epistemic Planning
In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm for epistemic planning based on dynamic epistemic logic (DEL). The novelty is that we limit the depth of reasoning of the planning agent to an upper bound b, meaning that the p…
Epistemic Planning with Attention as a Bounded Resource
Where information grows abundant, attention becomes a scarce resource. As a result, agents must plan wisely how to allocate their attention in order to achieve epistemic efficiency. Here, we present a framework for multi…
An Epistemic Foundation for Authentication Logics (Extended Abstract)
While there have been many attempts, going back to BAN logic, to base reasoning about security protocols on epistemic notions, they have not been all that successful. Arguably, this has been due to the particular logics …
TranslationProceedings Eighteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge
The TARK conference (Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge) is a biannual conference that aims to bring together researchers from a wide variety of fields, including computer science, artificial intelligence, …
Epistemic ReasoningPhilosophyReasoning about Bounded Reasoning
Interactive decision-making relies on strategic reasoning. Two prominent frameworks are (1) models of bounded reasoning, exemplified by level-$k$ models, which keep reasoning implicit, and (2) epistemic game theory, whic…