Detecting hidden confounding in observational data using multiple environments
A common assumption in causal inference from observational data is that there is no hidden confounding. Yet it is, in general, impossible to verify this assumption from a single dataset. Under the assumption of independent causal mechanisms underlying the data-generating process, we demonstrate a way to detect unobserved confounders when having multiple observational datasets coming from different environments. We present a theory for testable conditional independencies that are only absent when there is hidden confounding and examine cases where we violate its assumptions: degenerate & dependent mechanisms, and faithfulness violations. Additionally, we propose a procedure to test these independencies and study its empirical finite-sample behavior using simulation studies and semi-synthetic data based on a real-world dataset. In most cases, the proposed procedure correctly predicts the presence of hidden confounding, particularly when the confounding bias is large.
Code (1)
Tasks
Causal InferenceSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Removing Hidden Confounding by Experimental Grounding
Observational data is increasingly used as a means for making individual-level causal predictions and intervention recommendations. The foremost challenge of causal inference from observational data is hidden confounding…
Causal InferencePartial Identification of Dose Responses with Hidden Confounders
Inferring causal effects of continuous-valued treatments from observational data is a crucial task promising to better inform policy- and decision-makers. A critical assumption needed to identify these effects is that al…
Causal InferenceDecision MakingDisentanglementSensitivityA Partial Initialization Strategy to Mitigate the Overfitting Problem in CATE Estimation with Hidden Confounding
Estimating the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) from observational data plays a crucial role in areas such as e-commerce, healthcare, and economics. Existing studies mainly rely on the strong ignorability assu…
counterfactualVariational Temporal Deconfounder for Individualized Treatment Effect Estimation from Longitudinal Observational Data
Estimating treatment effects, especially individualized treatment effects (ITE), using observational data is challenging due to the complex situations of confounding bias. Existing approaches for estimating treatment eff…
Uncovering Bias Mechanisms in Observational Studies
Observational studies are a key resource for causal inference but are often affected by systematic biases. Prior work has focused mainly on detecting these biases, via sensitivity analyses and comparisons with randomized…
Causal Inference