paper-with-me

Papers

Detecting High-Stakes Interactions with Activation Probes

2025-06-12 · Alex McKenzie, Urja Pawar, Phil Blandfort, William Bankes, David Krueger, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Dmitrii Krasheninnikov

Monitoring is an important aspect of safely deploying Large Language Models (LLMs). This paper examines activation probes for detecting "high-stakes" interactions -- where the text indicates that the interaction might lead to significant harm -- as a critical, yet underexplored, target for such monitoring. We evaluate several probe architectures trained on synthetic data, and find them to exhibit robust generalization to diverse, out-of-distribution, real-world data. Probes' performance is comparable to that of prompted or finetuned medium-sized LLM monitors, while offering computational savings of six orders-of-magnitude. Our experiments also highlight the potential of building resource-aware hierarchical monitoring systems, where probes serve as an efficient initial filter and flag cases for more expensive downstream analysis. We release our novel synthetic dataset and codebase to encourage further study.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2506.10805

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Red-teaming Activation Probes using Prompted LLMs

2025-11-01 · Phil Blandfort, Robert Graham arxiv

Activation probes are attractive monitors for AI systems due to low cost and latency, but their real-world robustness remains underexplored. We ask: What failure modes arise under realistic, black-box adversarial pressur…

Probing the Misaligned Thinking Process of Language Models

2026-06-23 · Kaiwen Zhou, Constantin Venhoff, Jonathan Michala, Xin Eric Wang 외 arxiv

Large language models exhibit a growing range of misaligned behaviors such as strategic deception, sandbagging, and self-preservation. As they are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings, it is critical to reliably…

Benchmarking Deception Probes via Black-to-White Performance Boosts

2025-07-16 · Avi Parrack, Carlo Leonardo Attubato, Stefan Heimersheim arxiv

AI assistants will occasionally respond deceptively to user queries. Recently, linear classifiers (called "deception probes") have been trained to distinguish the internal activations of a language model during deceptive…

Probing the Probes: Methods and Metrics for Concept Alignment

2025-11-06 · Jacob Lysnæs-Larsen, Marte Eggen, Inga Strümke arxiv

In explainable AI, Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) are typically obtained by training linear classifier probes to detect human-understandable concepts as directions in the activation space of deep neural networks. It i…

Caught in the Act: a mechanistic approach to detecting deception

2025-08-27 · Gerard Boxo, Ryan Socha, Daniel Yoo, Shivam Raval arxiv

Sophisticated instrumentation for AI systems might have indicators that signal misalignment from human values, not unlike a "check engine" light in cars. One such indicator of misalignment is deceptiveness in generated r…