paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Detecting Perspectives in Political Debates

2017-09-01 · EMNLP 2017 9 · David Vilares, Yulan He

We explore how to detect people{'}s perspectives that occupy a certain proposition. We propose a Bayesian modelling approach where topics (or propositions) and their associated perspectives (or viewpoints) are modeled as latent variables. Words associated with topics or perspectives follow different generative routes. Based on the extracted perspectives, we can extract the top associated sentences from text to generate a succinct summary which allows a quick glimpse of the main viewpoints in a document. The model is evaluated on debates from the House of Commons of the UK Parliament, revealing perspectives from the debates without the use of labelled data and obtaining better results than previous related solutions under a variety of evaluations.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX

Code (1)

aghie/lam 공식 구현

Tasks

Topic Models

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Detecting Check-Worthy Claims in Political Debates, Speeches, and Interviews Using Audio Data

2023-05-24 · Petar Ivanov, Ivan Koychev, Momchil Hardalov, Preslav Nakov

Developing tools to automatically detect check-worthy claims in political debates and speeches can greatly help moderators of debates, journalists, and fact-checkers. While previous work on this problem has focused exclu…

Fact CheckingMisinformation

FREDSum: A Dialogue Summarization Corpus for French Political Debates

2023-12-08 · Virgile Rennard, Guokan Shang, Damien Grari, Julie Hunter 외

Recent advances in deep learning, and especially the invention of encoder-decoder architectures, has significantly improved the performance of abstractive summarization systems. The majority of research has focused on wr…

Abstractive Text SummarizationDecoder

Who Argues What? Joint Argument-Entity Detection and Classification in Political Debates

2026-09-09 · Lucio La Cava, Stefano Francesco Monea, Sergio Greco arxiv

Political debates are often analyzed through Argument Mining (AM) to investigate the key arguments that drive them. However, political arguments are rarely interpretable from argumentative spans alone, as claims and prem…

Argument Mining

Analysing Personal Attacks in U.S. Presidential Debates

2025-11-14 · Ruban Goyal, Rohitash Chandra, Sonit Singh arxiv

Personal attacks have become a notable feature of U.S. presidential debates and play an important role in shaping public perception during elections. Detecting such attacks can improve transparency in political discourse…

The Wisdom of Polarized Crowds

2017-11-29 · Feng Shi, Misha Teplitskiy, Eamon Duede, James Evans

As political polarization in the United States continues to rise, the question of whether polarized individuals can fruitfully cooperate becomes pressing. Although diversity of individual perspectives typically leads to …

ArticlesMisinformation