paper-with-me

Papers

Determining the Veracity of Rumours on Twitter

2016-11-19 · Georgios Giasemidis, Colin Singleton, Ioannis Agrafiotis, Jason R. C. Nurse, Alan Pilgrim, Chris Willis, Danica Vukadinovic Greetham

While social networks can provide an ideal platform for up-to-date information from individuals across the world, it has also proved to be a place where rumours fester and accidental or deliberate misinformation often emerges. In this article, we aim to support the task of making sense from social media data, and specifically, seek to build an autonomous message-classifier that filters relevant and trustworthy information from Twitter. For our work, we collected about 100 million public tweets, including users' past tweets, from which we identified 72 rumours (41 true, 31 false). We considered over 80 trustworthiness measures including the authors' profile and past behaviour, the social network connections (graphs), and the content of tweets themselves. We ran modern machine-learning classifiers over those measures to produce trustworthiness scores at various time windows from the outbreak of the rumour. Such time-windows were key as they allowed useful insight into the progression of the rumours. From our findings, we identified that our model was significantly more accurate than similar studies in the literature. We also identified critical attributes of the data that give rise to the trustworthiness scores assigned. Finally we developed a software demonstration that provides a visual user interface to allow the user to examine the analysis.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1611.06314

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

MisinformationRumour Detection

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

NileTMRG at SemEval-2017 Task 8: Determining Rumour and Veracity Support for Rumours on Twitter.

2017-08-01 · SEMEVAL 2017 8 · Omar Enayet, Samhaa R. El-Beltagy

Final submission for NileTMRG on RumourEval 2017.

Rumour Detection

IITP at SemEval-2017 Task 8 : A Supervised Approach for Rumour Evaluation

2017-08-01 · SEMEVAL 2017 8 · Vikram Singh, Sunny Narayan, Md. Shad Akhtar, Asif Ekbal 외

This paper describes our system participation in the SemEval-2017 Task 8 {`}RumourEval: Determining rumour veracity and support for rumours{'}. The objective of this task was to predict the stance and veracity of the und…

Decision MakingGeneral ClassificationRumour Detection

Turing at SemEval-2017 Task 8: Sequential Approach to Rumour Stance Classification with Branch-LSTM

2017-04-24 · SEMEVAL 2017 8 · Elena Kochkina, Maria Liakata, Isabelle Augenstein

This paper describes team Turing's submission to SemEval 2017 RumourEval: Determining rumour veracity and support for rumours (SemEval 2017 Task 8, Subtask A). Subtask A addresses the challenge of rumour stance classific…

General ClassificationRumour DetectionStance ClassificationStance Detection

RumourEval 2019: Determining Rumour Veracity and Support for Rumours

2018-09-18 · Genevieve Gorrell, Kalina Bontcheva, Leon Derczynski, Elena Kochkina 외

This is the proposal for RumourEval-2019, which will run in early 2019 as part of that year's SemEval event. Since the first RumourEval shared task in 2017, interest in automated claim validation has greatly increased, a…

Rumour Detection

SemEval-2019 Task 7: RumourEval, Determining Rumour Veracity and Support for Rumours

2019-06-01 · SEMEVAL 2019 6 · Genevieve Gorrell, Elena Kochkina, Maria Liakata, Ahmet Aker 외

Since the first RumourEval shared task in 2017, interest in automated claim validation has greatly increased, as the danger of {``}fake news{''} has become a mainstream concern. However automated support for rumour verif…

Rumour Detection