Diagnosing Evidence Utilization in Long-Context and Retrieval-Augmented Language Models under Matched Evidence Conditions
Final-answer accuracy, retrieval recall, and citation overlap do not reveal how much answer advantage a long-context or retrieval-augmented language model actually recovers from supplied evidence. A model may answer from parametric priors, fail to use evidence that is present, or cite relevant text without converting it into the final answer. This paper introduces a four-condition diagnostic protocol for evidence-utilization evaluation under matched examples, models, prompts, and scoring rules. The protocol compares no-evidence, full-context, retrieved-evidence, and oracle-evidence reference conditions, and uses Oracle-Reference Normalized Context Utilization (ONCU) as a denominator-valid estimate of recovered oracle-reference evidence advantage. The empirical study evaluates five local open-weight models from the Qwen, Gemma, Llama, and Mistral families over Controlled-ONCU-safe16K, HotpotQA-ONCU, and 2WikiMultiHopQA-ONCU, comprising 18,000 ONCU-compatible predictions. Results show a task-dependent diagnostic pattern: controlled synthetic settings expose reduced recovery when the same evidence is embedded in long input rather than supplied compactly, while realistic multi-hop reconstructions show that full-context inputs outperform the tested retrieved inputs in denominator-free answer and evidence metrics, with ONCU supporting the same direction on oracle-improving groups. Sensitivity audits with stronger retrieval settings narrow some gaps but do not overturn the scoped interpretation. The main contribution is therefore not a single utilization ratio, but a matched diagnostic protocol that separates no-evidence answerability, oracle-evidence recoverability, full-context recovery, retrieval-conditioned recovery, denominator validity, and companion answer/evidence diagnostics.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
ReContext: Recursive Evidence Replay as LLM Harness for Long-Context Reasoning
Understanding and reasoning over long contexts has become a key requirement for deploying large language models (LLMs) in realistic applications. Although recent LLMs support increasingly long context windows, they often…
Answer GenerationWhenLoss: Diagnosing Write and Retrieval Bottlenecks in Long-Context Memory Systems
Long-context memory systems often fail under fixed budgets, but end-to-end evaluation does not reveal whether evidence was discarded during compression or preserved but never retrieved. We introduce a four-condition diag…
Diagnosing Retrieval vs. Utilization Bottlenecks in LLM Agent Memory
Memory-augmented LLM agents store and retrieve information from prior interactions, yet the relative importance of how memories are written versus how they are retrieved remains unclear. We introduce a diagnostic framewo…
UTILMEM: Benchmarking Evidence Utilization in Long-Term Conversational Memory
Long-term memory is increasingly important for conversational agents, yet existing benchmarks primarily measure memory through pointwise factual recall: whether a system can recover isolated facts or event-level details …
Uncertainty-Aware Hybrid Retrieval for Long-Document RAG
Retrieval augmented generation (RAG) depends critically on the quality and granularity of retrieved evidence. Large retrieval units preserve context but often introduce irrelevant content, which can dilute answer bearing…
Question Answering