Difference-in-Differences when Parallel Trends Holds Conditional on Covariates
In this paper, we study difference-in-differences identification and estimation strategies when the parallel trends assumption holds after conditioning on covariates. We consider empirically relevant settings where the covariates can be time-varying, time-invariant, or both. We uncover a number of weaknesses of commonly used two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regressions in this context, even in applications with only two time periods. In addition to some weaknesses due to estimating linear regression models that are similar to cases with cross-sectional data, we also point out a collection of additional issues that we refer to as \textit{hidden linearity bias} that arise because the transformations used to eliminate the unit fixed effect also transform the covariates (e.g., taking first differences can result in the estimating equation only including the change in covariates over time, not their level, and also drop time-invariant covariates altogether). We provide simple diagnostics for assessing how susceptible a TWFE regression is to hidden linearity bias based on reformulating the TWFE regression as a weighting estimator. Finally, we propose simple alternative estimation strategies that can circumvent these issues.
Code (1)
Tasks
regressionMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
When Is Parallel Trends Sensitive to Functional Form?
This paper assesses when the validity of difference-in-differences depends on functional form. We provide a novel characterization: the parallel trends assumption holds under all strictly monotonic transformations of the…
FormParallel Trends and Dynamic Choices
Difference-in-differences is a common method for estimating treatment effects, and the parallel trends condition is its main identifying assumption: the trend in mean untreated outcomes is independent of the observed tre…
Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods
In this article, we consider identification, estimation, and inference procedures for treatment effect parameters using Difference-in-Differences (DID) with (i) multiple time periods, (ii) variation in treatment timing, …
validTesting for equivalence of pre-trends in Difference-in-Differences estimation
The plausibility of the ``parallel trends assumption'' in Difference-in-Differences estimation is usually assessed by a test of the null hypothesis that the difference between the average outcomes of both groups is const…
Simple Difference-in-Differences Estimation in Fixed-T Panels
The present paper proposes a new treatment effects estimator that is valid when the number of time periods is small, and the parallel trends condition holds conditional on covariates and unobserved heterogeneity in the f…
valid