paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Disagreement Matters: Preserving Label Diversity by Jointly Modeling Item and Annotator Label Distributions with DisCo

2023-07-01 · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 2023 7 · Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya, Alexander Ororbia, Raj Bhensadadia, Ashiqur KhudaBukhsh, Christopher Homan

Annotator disagreement is common whenever human judgment is needed for supervised learning. It is conventional to assume that one label per item represents ground truth. However, this obscures minority opinions, if present. We regard “ground truth” as the distribution of all labels that a population of annotators could produce, if asked (and of which we only have a small sample). We next introduce DisCo (Distribution from Context), a simple neural model that learns to predict this distribution. The model takes annotator-item pairs, rather than items alone, as input, and performs inference by aggregating over all annotators. Despite its simplicity, our experiments show that, on six benchmark datasets, our model is competitive with, and frequently outperforms, other, more complex models that either do not model specific annotators or were not designed for label distribution learning.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX

Code (1)

Homan-Lab/disco tf

Tasks

Diversity

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Everyone's Voice Matters: Quantifying Annotation Disagreement Using Demographic Information

2023-01-12 · Ruyuan Wan, Jaehyung Kim, Dongyeop Kang

In NLP annotation, it is common to have multiple annotators label the text and then obtain the ground truth labels based on the agreement of major annotators. However, annotators are individuals with different background…

Learning Who Disagrees: Demographic Importance Weighting for Modeling Annotator Distributions with DiADEM

2026-04-09 · Samay U. Shetty, Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya, Deepak Pandita, Christopher M. Homan arxiv

When humans label subjective content, they disagree, and that disagreement is not noise. It reflects genuine differences in perspective shaped by annotators' social identities and lived experiences. Yet standard practice…

Ensemble Diversity Optimization for Subjective Supervision

2026-07-09 · Xia Cui, Ziyi Huang, N. R. Abeynayake arxiv

Subjective NLP tasks often exhibit systematic annotator disagreement, requiring models that represent uncertainty rather than collapse it. We introduce Ensemble Diversity Optimization (EDO), a prediction-space framework …

Aligning LLM Uncertainty with Human Disagreement in Subjectivity Analysis

2026-05-11 · Junyu Lu, Deyi Ji, Xuanyi Liu, Lanyun Zhu 외 arxiv

Large language models for subjectivity analysis are typically trained with aggregated labels, which compress variations in human judgment into a single supervision signal. This paradigm overlooks the intrinsic uncertaint…

Subjectivity Analysis

Multi-Head Attention with Disagreement Regularization

2018-10-24 · EMNLP 2018 10 · Jian Li, Zhaopeng Tu, Baosong Yang, Michael R. Lyu 외

Multi-head attention is appealing for the ability to jointly attend to information from different representation subspaces at different positions. In this work, we introduce a disagreement regularization to explicitly en…

DiversityTranslation