paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Disentangling Length Bias In Preference Learning Via Response-Conditioned Modeling

2025-02-02 · JianFeng Cai, Jinhua Zhu, Ruopei Sun, Yue Wang, Li Li, Wengang Zhou, Houqiang Li

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has achieved considerable success in aligning large language models (LLMs) by modeling human preferences with a learnable reward model and employing a reinforcement learning algorithm to maximize the reward model's scores. However, these reward models are susceptible to exploitation through various superficial confounding factors, with length bias emerging as a particularly significant concern. Moreover, while the pronounced impact of length bias on preference modeling suggests that LLMs possess an inherent sensitivity to length perception, our preliminary investigations reveal that fine-tuned LLMs consistently struggle to adhere to explicit length instructions. To address these two limitations, we propose a novel framework wherein the reward model explicitly differentiates between human semantic preferences and response length requirements. Specifically, we introduce a $\textbf{R}$esponse-$\textbf{c}$onditioned $\textbf{B}$radley-$\textbf{T}$erry (Rc-BT) model that enhances the model's capability in length bias mitigating and length instruction following, through training on our augmented dataset. Furthermore, we propose the Rc-RM and Rc-DPO algorithm to leverage the Rc-BT model for reward modeling and direct policy optimization (DPO) of LLMs, simultaneously mitigating length bias and promoting adherence to length instructions. Extensive experiments across various foundational models and datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and generalizability of our approach.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2502.00814

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Instruction Following

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Explaining Length Bias in LLM-Based Preference Evaluations

2024-07-01 · Zhengyu Hu, Linxin Song, Jieyu Zhang, Zheyuan Xiao 외

The use of large language models (LLMs) as judges, particularly in preference comparisons, has become widespread, but this reveals a notable bias towards longer responses, undermining the reliability of such evaluations.…

Language ModellingLarge Language Model

Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization

2024-03-28 · Ryan Park, Rafael Rafailov, Stefano Ermon, Chelsea Finn

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has been a crucial component in the recent success of Large Language Models. However, RLHF is know to exploit biases in human preferences, such as verbosity. A well-forma…

reinforcement-learningReinforcement Learning

Bias Fitting to Mitigate Length Bias of Reward Model in RLHF

2025-05-19 · Kangwen Zhao, JianFeng Cai, Jinhua Zhu, Ruopei Sun 외

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback relies on reward models to align large language models with human preferences. However, RLHF often suffers from reward hacking, wherein policy learning exploits flaws in the tra…

Relation

Diverse, not Short: A Length-Controlled Self-Learning Framework for Improving Response Diversity of Language Models

2025-05-22 · Vijeta Deshpande, Debasmita Ghose, John D. Patterson, Roger Beaty 외

Diverse language model responses are crucial for creative generation, open-ended tasks, and self-improvement training. We show that common diversity metrics, and even reward models used for preference optimization, syste…

DiversitySelf-Learning

Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluators

2024-04-06 · Yann Dubois, Balázs Galambosi, Percy Liang, Tatsunori B. Hashimoto

LLM-based auto-annotators have become a key component of the LLM development process due to their cost-effectiveness and scalability compared to human-based evaluation. However, these auto-annotators can introduce comple…

Chatbotcounterfactual