Dive Into the Implicit Biases of Low-rank Vision-language Alignment
Vision-language alignment, the stage that bridges pretrained vision encoders and large language models, is widely treated as a form of pretraining requiring full-parameter updates. We challenge this view and investigate what happens when low-rank adaptation is applied to the LLM during this stage instead. We find that low-rank alignment not only reduces computational costs but also outperforms full-parameter alignment on most benchmarks. To understand this phenomenon, we systematically characterize the implicit biases introduced by low-rank adaptation during alignment. Empirically, we find that low-rank alignment shifts model behavior from hallucinatory to conservative and preserves per-token linear separability of visual features that full-parameter alignment disrupts, a phenomenon we term LS-curse. Geometrically, low rank aligned models exhibit more homogeneous and structurally stable visual representations, maintaining modality-specific knowledge rather than prematurely fusing entity-level semantics. Theoretically, we establish two theorems showing that low-rank alignment induces preferences for parameter subspaces with flat gradients and feature subspaces robust to perturbations, providing a principled explanation for the observed structure-preserving behavior. Extensive experiments cover ablation over 100 alignment configurations, three families of low-rank operators, and various rank, encoder, and other settings.
Code (2)
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
BiasDora: Exploring Hidden Biased Associations in Vision-Language Models
Existing works examining Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for social biases predominantly focus on a limited set of documented bias associations, such as gender:profession or race:crime. This narrow scope often overlooks a …
Towards Implicit Bias Detection and Mitigation in Multi-Agent LLM Interactions
As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to evolve, they are increasingly being employed in numerous studies to simulate societies and execute diverse social tasks. However, LLMs are susceptible to societal biases due to…
Bias DetectionA word association network methodology for evaluating implicit biases in LLMs compared to humans
As Large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into our lives, their inherent social biases remain a pressing concern. Detecting and evaluating these biases can be challenging because they are often impli…
VisBias: Measuring Explicit and Implicit Social Biases in Vision Language Models
This research investigates both explicit and implicit social biases exhibited by Vision-Language Models (VLMs). The key distinction between these bias types lies in the level of awareness: explicit bias refers to conscio…
Image DescriptionMultiple-choicePolicy-Gradient Training of Fair and Unbiased Ranking Functions
While implicit feedback (e.g., clicks, dwell times, etc.) is an abundant and attractive source of data for learning to rank, it can produce unfair ranking policies for both exogenous and endogenous reasons. Exogenous rea…
counterfactualDecision MakingFairnessLearning-To-Rank