paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Dive Into the Implicit Biases of Low-rank Vision-language Alignment

2026-07-09 · Mingjia Shi, Shuo Wang, Xiaobo Wang, Sifan Zhou, Kai Wang, Tianyu Fu, Chenxu Zhao, Anyang Su, Ping Jiang, Minghui Wu arxiv

Vision-language alignment, the stage that bridges pretrained vision encoders and large language models, is widely treated as a form of pretraining requiring full-parameter updates. We challenge this view and investigate what happens when low-rank adaptation is applied to the LLM during this stage instead. We find that low-rank alignment not only reduces computational costs but also outperforms full-parameter alignment on most benchmarks. To understand this phenomenon, we systematically characterize the implicit biases introduced by low-rank adaptation during alignment. Empirically, we find that low-rank alignment shifts model behavior from hallucinatory to conservative and preserves per-token linear separability of visual features that full-parameter alignment disrupts, a phenomenon we term LS-curse. Geometrically, low rank aligned models exhibit more homogeneous and structurally stable visual representations, maintaining modality-specific knowledge rather than prematurely fusing entity-level semantics. Theoretically, we establish two theorems showing that low-rank alignment induces preferences for parameter subspaces with flat gradients and feature subspaces robust to perturbations, providing a principled explanation for the observed structure-preserving behavior. Extensive experiments cover ablation over 100 alignment configurations, three families of low-rank operators, and various rank, encoder, and other settings.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2607.08194

Code (2)

Tavish9/awesome-daily-AI-arxiv ★ 111
arxivsub/arXivSub_daily_arxiv ★ 2

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

BiasDora: Exploring Hidden Biased Associations in Vision-Language Models

2024-07-02 · Chahat Raj, Anjishnu Mukherjee, Aylin Caliskan, Antonios Anastasopoulos 외

Existing works examining Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for social biases predominantly focus on a limited set of documented bias associations, such as gender:profession or race:crime. This narrow scope often overlooks a …

Towards Implicit Bias Detection and Mitigation in Multi-Agent LLM Interactions

2024-10-03 · Angana Borah, Rada Mihalcea

As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to evolve, they are increasingly being employed in numerous studies to simulate societies and execute diverse social tasks. However, LLMs are susceptible to societal biases due to…

Bias Detection

A word association network methodology for evaluating implicit biases in LLMs compared to humans

2025-10-28 · Katherine Abramski, Giulio Rossetti, Massimo Stella arxiv

As Large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into our lives, their inherent social biases remain a pressing concern. Detecting and evaluating these biases can be challenging because they are often impli…

VisBias: Measuring Explicit and Implicit Social Biases in Vision Language Models

2025-03-10 · Jen-tse Huang, Jiantong Qin, Jianping Zhang, Youliang Yuan 외

This research investigates both explicit and implicit social biases exhibited by Vision-Language Models (VLMs). The key distinction between these bias types lies in the level of awareness: explicit bias refers to conscio…

Image DescriptionMultiple-choice

Policy-Gradient Training of Fair and Unbiased Ranking Functions

2019-11-19 · Himank Yadav, Zhengxiao Du, Thorsten Joachims

While implicit feedback (e.g., clicks, dwell times, etc.) is an abundant and attractive source of data for learning to rank, it can produce unfair ranking policies for both exogenous and endogenous reasons. Exogenous rea…

counterfactualDecision MakingFairnessLearning-To-Rank