Diversity-Fair Online Selection
Online selection problems frequently arise in applications such as crowdsourcing and employee recruitment. Existing research typically focuses on candidates with a single attribute. However, crowdsourcing tasks often require contributions from individuals across various demographics. Further motivated by the dynamic nature of crowdsourcing and hiring, we study the diversity-fair online selection problem, in which a recruiter must make real-time decisions to foster workforce diversity across many dimensions. We propose two scenarios for this problem. The fixed-capacity scenario, suited for short-term hiring for crowdsourced workers, provides the recruiter with a fixed capacity to fill temporary job vacancies. In contrast, in the unknown-capacity scenario, recruiters optimize diversity across recruitment seasons with increasing capacities, reflecting that the firm honors diversity consideration in a long-term employee acquisition strategy. By modeling the diversity over $d$ dimensions as a max-min fairness objective, we show that no policy can surpass a competitive ratio of $O(1/d^{1/3})$ for either scenario, indicating that any achievable result inevitably decays by some polynomial factor in $d$. To this end, we develop bilevel hierarchical randomized policies that ensure compliance with the capacity constraint. For the fixed-capacity scenario, leveraging marginal information about the arriving population allows us to achieve a competitive ratio of $1/(4\sqrt{d} \lceil \log_2 d \rceil)$. For the unknown-capacity scenario, we establish a competitive ratio of $\Omega(1/d^{3/4})$ under mild boundedness conditions. In both bilevel hierarchical policies, the higher level determines ex-ante selection probabilities and then informs the lower level's randomized selection that ensures no loss in efficiency. Both policies prioritize core diversity and then adjust for underrepresented dimensions.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
AttributeDiversityFairnessSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
FRAMM: Fair Ranking with Missing Modalities for Clinical Trial Site Selection
Despite many efforts to address the disparities, the underrepresentation of gender, racial, and ethnic minorities in clinical trials remains a problem and undermines the efficacy of treatments on minorities. This paper f…
Deep Reinforcement LearningDiversityFairnessImputation+1Emulating Full Participation: An Effective and Fair Client Selection Strategy for Federated Learning
In federated learning, client selection is a critical problem that significantly impacts both model performance and fairness. Prior studies typically treat these two objectives separately, or balance them using simple we…
DiversityFairnessFederated LearningMultidimensional Fairness in Paper Recommendation
To prevent potential bias in the paper review and selection process for conferences and journals, most include double blind review. Despite this, studies show that bias still exists. Recommendation algorithms for paper r…
ArticlesDiversityFairnessDiversity and Inclusion Metrics in Subset Selection
The ethical concept of fairness has recently been applied in machine learning (ML) settings to describe a wide range of constraints and objectives. When considering the relevance of ethical concepts to subset selection p…
DiversityFairnessFairFS: Addressing Deep Feature Selection Biases for Recommender System
Large-scale online marketplaces and recommender systems serve as critical technological support for e-commerce development. In industrial recommender systems, features play vital roles as they carry information for downs…
Feature Importance