Do Differences in Values Influence Disagreements in Online Discussions?
Disagreements are common in online discussions. Disagreement may foster collaboration and improve the quality of a discussion under some conditions. Although there exist methods for recognizing disagreement, a deeper understanding of factors that influence disagreement is lacking in the literature. We investigate a hypothesis that differences in personal values are indicative of disagreement in online discussions. We show how state-of-the-art models can be used for estimating values in online discussions and how the estimated values can be aggregated into value profiles. We evaluate the estimated value profiles based on human-annotated agreement labels. We find that the dissimilarity of value profiles correlates with disagreement in specific cases. We also find that including value information in agreement prediction improves performance.
Code (1)
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
AI Persuasion, Bayesian Attribution, and Career Concerns of Doctors
This paper examines how AI persuades doctors when their diagnoses differ. Disagreements arise from two sources: attention differences, which are objective and play a complementary role to the doctor, and comprehension di…
Anomaly DetectionAttributeDiagnosticA Corpus of Participant Roles in Contentious Discussions
The expansion of social roles is, nowadays, a fact due to the ability of users to interact, discuss, exchange ideas and opinions, and form social networks though social media. Users in online social environment play a va…
Decision MakingDetecting Sociostructural Beliefs about Group Status Differences in Online Discussions
Why They Disagree: Decoding Differences in Opinions about AI Risk on the Lex Fridman Podcast
The emergence of transformative technologies often surfaces deep societal divisions, nowhere more evident than in contemporary debates about artificial intelligence (AI). A striking feature of these divisions is that the…
D3CODE: Disentangling Disagreements in Data across Cultures on Offensiveness Detection and Evaluation
While human annotations play a crucial role in language technologies, annotator subjectivity has long been overlooked in data collection. Recent studies that have critically examined this issue are often situated in the …
4k