paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

“Don’t discuss”: Investigating Semantic and Argumentative Features for Supervised Propagandist Message Detection and Classification

2021-09-01 · RANLP 2021 9 · Vorakit Vorakitphan, Elena Cabrio, Serena Villata

One of the mechanisms through which disinformation is spreading online, in particular through social media, is by employing propaganda techniques. These include specific rhetorical and psychological strategies, ranging from leveraging on emotions to exploiting logical fallacies. In this paper, our goal is to push forward research on propaganda detection based on text analysis, given the crucial role these methods may play to address this main societal issue. More precisely, we propose a supervised approach to classify textual snippets both as propaganda messages and according to the precise applied propaganda technique, as well as a detailed linguistic analysis of the features characterising propaganda information in text (e.g., semantic, sentiment and argumentation features). Extensive experiments conducted on two available propagandist resources (i.e., NLP4IF’19 and SemEval’20-Task 11 datasets) show that the proposed approach, leveraging different language models and the investigated linguistic features, achieves very promising results on propaganda classification, both at sentence- and at fragment-level.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Logical FallaciesPropaganda detectionSentence

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Implicit Knowledge in Argumentative Texts: An Annotated Corpus

2019-12-04 · LREC 2020 5 · Maria Becker, Katharina Korfhage, Anette Frank

When speaking or writing, people omit information that seems clear and evident, such that only part of the message is expressed in words. Especially in argumentative texts it is very common that (important) parts of the …

Corpus for Modeling User Interactions in Online Persuasive Discussions

2020-05-01 · LREC 2020 5 · Ryo Egawa, Gaku Morio, Katsuhide Fujita

Persuasions are common in online arguments such as discussion forums. To analyze persuasive strategies, it is important to understand how individuals construct posts and comments based on the semantics of the argumentati…

Argument MiningPersuasiveness

From Argument Search to Argumentative Dialogue: A Topic-independent Approach to Argument Acquisition for Dialogue Systems

2021-07-01 · SIGDIAL (ACL) 2021 7 · Niklas Rach, Carolin Schindler, Isabel Feustel, Johannes Daxenberger 외

Despite the remarkable progress in the field of computational argumentation, dialogue systems concerned with argumentative tasks often rely on structured knowledge about arguments and their relations. Since the manual ac…

Relation Classification

Classifying Argumentative Relations Using Logical Mechanisms and Argumentation Schemes

2021-05-17 · Yohan Jo, Seojin Bang, Chris Reed, Eduard Hovy

While argument mining has achieved significant success in classifying argumentative relations between statements (support, attack, and neutral), we have a limited computational understanding of logical mechanisms that co…

Argument MiningRelationRepresentation Learning

Dave the debater: a retrieval-based and generative argumentative dialogue agent

2018-11-01 · WS 2018 11 · Dieu Thu Le, Cam-Tu Nguyen, Kim Anh Nguyen

In this paper, we explore the problem of developing an argumentative dialogue agent that can be able to discuss with human users on controversial topics. We describe two systems that use retrieval-based and generative mo…

Argument MiningRetrievalStance Detection