paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Drop the Act: Probe-Filtered RL for Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

2026-05-12 · Swapnil Parekh arxiv

Reasoning models post-hoc rationalize answers they have already committed to internally, producing chains of *reasoning theater*: deliberative-looking steps that contribute nothing to correctness. This wastes inference tokens, pollutes interpretability, and obscures what the model actually computed. We introduce ProFIL (Probe-Filtered Reinforcement Learning) to *reduce theater, increase chain-of-thought faithfulness, and shrink chain length* in a single, drop-in extension to Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). A multi-head attention probe is trained *once* on the *frozen* base model to detect post-commitment steps from internal activations alone; during GRPO, rollouts whose probe score exceeds a threshold have their advantage zeroed. *Our central finding is that a probe trained on a frozen base, with verifier-derived labels and no human annotation, provides a stable signal that suppresses theater while resisting the RL-obfuscation failure mode predicted by prior work.* Across four reasoning domains (GSM8K, LiveCodeBench, ToolUse, MMLU-Redux) and two model architectures (Llama-8B, Qwen-7B), ProFIL reduces post-commitment theater by 11--100%, raises faithful-fraction (e.g., +24pp on LiveCodeBench under an independent Claude 3.7 Sonnet judge), and shortens chains by 4--19%, all while preserving or improving task accuracy. ProFIL also beats a matched length-penalty GRPO baseline, isolating the gain as semantic commitment-detection rather than chain compression. Probe weights, training configurations, and rollouts are released across all four domains.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.11467

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Reinforcement Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Chain-of-Thought Unfaithfulness as Disguised Accuracy

2024-02-22 · Oliver Bentham, Nathan Stringham, Ana Marasović

Understanding the extent to which Chain-of-Thought (CoT) generations align with a large language model's (LLM) internal computations is critical for deciding whether to trust an LLM's output. As a proxy for CoT faithfuln…

Chains That See, Answers That Don't: A Multi-Aspect Evaluation Recipe for Forced Chain-of-Thought on Video-MME

2026-06-22 · Zhichao Fan, Yanhang Li, Zexin Zhuang arxiv

Forced chain-of-thought (CoT) is widely assumed to make vision-language models more reliable on video question answering. We propose a small three-probe evaluation recipe to test that assumption: paired accuracy across d…

Video Question Answering

The Hypocrisy Gap: Quantifying Divergence Between Internal Belief and Chain-of-Thought Explanation via Sparse Autoencoders

2026-01-14 · Shikhar Shiromani, Archie Chaudhury, Sri Pranav Kunda arxiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently exhibit unfaithful behavior, producing a final answer that differs significantly from their internal chain of thought (CoT) reasoning in order to appease the user they are conversi…

Two Regimes of Chain-of-Thought Unfaithfulness: Behavioral Detection Fails Where Models Are Wrong

2026-07-26 · Suramya R. Angdembay, Dikshant Aryal, Nick Rahimi arxiv

Chain-of-thought (CoT) explanations support oversight only if they are faithful: the stated reasoning must actually produce the answer. Auditing black-box (behavioral) detection of unfaithful CoT against FaithCoT-Bench's…

The Chain Holds, the Answer Folds: Trace-Answer Dissociation in Reasoning Models Under Adversarial Pressure

2026-05-27 · Yubo Li, Ramayya Krishnan, Rema Padman arxiv

Reasoning models are evaluated on single-turn benchmarks but deployed in multi-turn dialogue, where users push back on correct answers. Under sustained adversarial pressure we find a previously undocumented failure mode:…