DSGram: Dynamic Weighting Sub-Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction in the Era of Large Language Models
Evaluating the performance of Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) models has become increasingly challenging, as large language model (LLM)-based GEC systems often produce corrections that diverge from provided gold references. This discrepancy undermines the reliability of traditional reference-based evaluation metrics. In this study, we propose a novel evaluation framework for GEC models, DSGram, integrating Semantic Coherence, Edit Level, and Fluency, and utilizing a dynamic weighting mechanism. Our framework employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in conjunction with large language models to ascertain the relative importance of various evaluation criteria. Additionally, we develop a dataset incorporating human annotations and LLM-simulated sentences to validate our algorithms and fine-tune more cost-effective models. Experimental results indicate that our proposed approach enhances the effectiveness of GEC model evaluations.
Code (1)
Tasks
Grammatical Error CorrectionLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Automated Essay Scoring Using Grammatical Variety and Errors with Multi-Task Learning and Item Response Theory
This study examines the effect of grammatical features in automatic essay scoring (AES). We use two kinds of grammatical features as input to an AES model: (1) grammatical items that writers used correctly in essays, and…
Automated Essay ScoringMulti-Task LearningCL$^2$GEC: A Multi-Discipline Benchmark for Continual Learning in Chinese Literature Grammatical Error Correction
The growing demand for automated writing assistance in diverse academic domains highlights the need for robust Chinese Grammatical Error Correction (CGEC) systems that can adapt across disciplines. However, existing CGEC…
Grammatical Error CorrectionContinual LearningThere's No Comparison: Reference-less Evaluation Metrics in Grammatical Error Correction
Current methods for automatically evaluating grammatical error correction (GEC) systems rely on gold-standard references. However, these methods suffer from penalizing grammatical edits that are correct but not in the go…
BenchmarkingGrammatical Error CorrectionSentenceReference-based Metrics can be Replaced with Reference-less Metrics in Evaluating Grammatical Error Correction Systems
In grammatical error correction (GEC), automatically evaluating system outputs requires gold-standard references, which must be created manually and thus tend to be both expensive and limited in coverage. To address this…
Grammatical Error CorrectionMachine TranslationQualitative Evaluation of Language Model Rescoring in Automatic Speech Recognition
Evaluating automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems is a classical but difficult and still open problem, which often boils down to focusing only on the word error rate (WER). However, this metric suffers from many limi…
Speech Recognition