paper-with-me

Papers

Dynamic Execution Commitment of Vision-Language-Action Models

2026-05-12 · Feng Chen, Xianghui Wang, Yuxuan Chen, Boying Li, Yefei He, Zeyu Zhang, Yicheng Wu arxiv

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models predominantly adopt action chunking, i.e., predicting and committing to a short horizon of consecutive low-level actions in a single forward pass, to amortize the inference cost of large-scale backbones and reduce per-step latency. However, committing these multi-step predictions to real-world execution requires balancing success rate against inference efficiency, a decision typically governed by fixed execution horizons tuned per task. Such heuristics ignore the state-dependent nature of predictive reliability, leading to brittle performance in dynamic or out-of-distribution settings. In this paper, we introduce A3, an Adaptive Action Acceptance mechanism that reframes dynamic execution commitment as a self-speculative prefix verification problem. A3 first computes a trajectory-wise consensus score of actions via group sampling, then selects a representative draft and prioritizes downstream verification. Specifically, it enforces: (1) consensus-ordered conditional invariance, which validates low-consensus actions by judging whether they remain consistent when re-decoded conditioned on high-consensus actions; and (2) prefix-closed sequential consistency, which guarantees physical rollout integrity by accepting only the longest continuous sequence of verified actions starting from the beginning. Consequently, the execution horizon emerges as the longest verifiable prefix satisfying both internal model logic and sequential execution constraints. Experiments across diverse VLA models and benchmarks demonstrate that A3 eliminates the need for manual horizon tuning while achieving a superior trade-off between execution robustness and inference throughput.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.11567

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

When to Re-Commit: Temporal Abstraction Discovery for Long-Horizon Vision-Language Reasoning

2026-05-11 · Chen Li, Zhantao Yang, Fangyi Chen, Han Zhang 외 arxiv

Long-horizon reasoning requires deciding not only what actions to take, but how deeply to commit before the next observation. We formalize this as \emph{commitment depth}: the number of primitive actions executed open-lo…

Consistency Ensuring in Social Web Services Based on Commitments Structure

2016-10-01 · Marzieh Adelnia, Mohammad Reza Khayyambashi

Web Service is one of the most significant current discussions in information sharing technologies and one of the examples of service oriented processing. To ensure accurate execution of web services operations, it must …

Done, But Not Sure: Disentangling World Completion from Self-Termination in Embodied Agents

2026-05-09 · Ying Chen, Lihuang Fang, Rui Jiang, Mingxu Wang 외 arxiv

Standard embodied evaluations do not independently score whether an agent correctly commits to task completion at episode closure, a capacity we call terminal commitment. Behaviorally distinct failures--never completing …

OpenClawBench: Benchmarking Process-side Anomalies in Real-world Agent Execution Trajectories

2026-05-28 · Yibing Liu, Yangze Liu, Xiaolong Yin, Bin Wang 외 arxiv

Task success can hide process anomalies in real-world agent executions. An agent may pass the final task oracle while still accumulating unresolved ambiguity, unsafe external writes, ignored errors, weakly grounded commi…

LocalLSTC: A Long Short-Term Control Architecture for Locally Deployed GUI Agents

2026-08-26 · Weiming Li, Helen Paik, Yulei Sui arxiv

Modern GUI-agent frameworks achieve strong desktop task performance with frontier API models, yet persistent control information often remains implicit in growing interaction trajectories. At each step, the planner recon…