Dynamical System Identification, Model Selection and Model Uncertainty Quantification by Bayesian Inference
This study presents a Bayesian maximum \textit{a~posteriori} (MAP) framework for dynamical system identification from time-series data. This is shown to be equivalent to a generalized Tikhonov regularization, providing a rational justification for the choice of the residual and regularization terms, respectively, from the negative logarithms of the likelihood and prior distributions. In addition to the estimation of model coefficients, the Bayesian interpretation gives access to the full apparatus for Bayesian inference, including the ranking of models, the quantification of model uncertainties and the estimation of unknown (nuisance) hyperparameters. Two Bayesian algorithms, joint maximum \textit{a~posteriori} (JMAP) and variational Bayesian approximation (VBA), are compared to the {LASSO, ridge regression and SINDy algorithms for sparse} regression, by application to several dynamical systems with added {Gaussian or Laplace} noise. For multivariate Gaussian likelihood and prior distributions, the Bayesian formulation gives Gaussian posterior and evidence distributions, in which the numerator terms can be expressed in terms of the Mahalanobis distance or ``Gaussian norm'' $||\vec{y}-\hat{\vec{y}}||^2_{M^{-1}} = (\vec{y}-\hat{\vec{y}})^\top {M^{-1}} (\vec{y}-\hat{\vec{y}})$, where $\vec{y}$ is a vector variable, $\hat{\vec{y}}$ is its estimator and $M$ is the covariance matrix. The posterior Gaussian norm is shown to provide a robust metric for quantitative model selection {for the different systems and noise models examined.}
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Bayesian InferencemodelModel SelectionregressionUncertainty QuantificationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Uncertainty-Aware Sparse Identification of Dynamical Systems via Bayesian Model Averaging
In many problems of data-driven modeling for dynamical systems, the governing equations are not known a priori and must be selected phenomenologically from a large set of candidate interactions and basis functions. In su…
Output-Weighted Optimal Sampling for Bayesian Experimental Design and Uncertainty Quantification
We introduce a class of acquisition functions for sample selection that leads to faster convergence in applications related to Bayesian experimental design and uncertainty quantification. The approach follows the paradig…
Active LearningExperimental DesignUncertainty QuantificationConvergence of uncertainty estimates in Ensemble and Bayesian sparse model discovery
Sparse model identification enables nonlinear dynamical system discovery from data. However, the control of false discoveries for sparse model identification is challenging, especially in the low-data and high-noise limi…
Model DiscoveryregressionUncertainty Quantificationvalid+1Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics with Conformal Prediction
The Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (SINDy) is a method for discovering nonlinear dynamical system models from data. Quantifying uncertainty in SINDy models is essential for assessing their reliability, parti…
Time Series ForecastingTime Series PredictionFeature ImportanceA Variational Inference Approach to Inverse Problems with Gamma Hyperpriors
Hierarchical models with gamma hyperpriors provide a flexible, sparse-promoting framework to bridge $L^1$ and $L^2$ regularizations in Bayesian formulations to inverse problems. Despite the Bayesian motivation for these …
Model SelectionTime SeriesTime Series AnalysisUncertainty Quantification+1