EASE-TTT: Evidence-Aligned Selective Test-Time Training for Long-Context Question Answering
Long-context question answering (QA) remains challenging for smaller language models even when answer-bearing evidence is already present in the input. Existing within-context retrieval methods localize and expose candidate evidence chunks for the question, but they stop at input-level evidence exposure rather than adapting the query-side attention parameters that control how the model allocates attention over full-context positions. In contrast, lightweight test-time adaptation methods, such as query-only test-time training (qTTT), leave evidence localization unresolved because their generic span-level self-supervised objectives do not identify which context positions support the current answer. In this paper, we propose Evidence-Aligned SElective Test-Time Training (EASE-TTT), a within-context retrieval-augmented test-time training framework that converts selected evidence chunks into a soft attention supervision target over their token positions. Instead of replacing the full context with retrieved chunks, EASE-TTT uses the resulting attention target to guide query-side adaptation, with the adapted model generating the final answer from the original full context. Experiments on six LongBench QA tasks and three small decoder-only language models show that EASE-TTT achieves the strongest macro-average performance among full-context inference, retrieval-only baselines, and qTTT, supporting evidence-aligned test-time adaptation in long-context QA.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Test-time AdaptationQuestion AnsweringSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Selective QA over Conflicting Multi-Source Personal Memory: A Diagnostic Testbed and Method Comparison
Emerging personal AI agents are moving toward persistent, multi-source memory. This creates an evaluation problem: systems must decide how to use conflicting or incomplete evidence; they cannot just retrieve facts from o…
THBKG: A Temporal Biomedical Knowledge Graph for Decision-Aligned Clinical Advancement Prediction
Inadequate target--disease linkage accounts for 40--50\% of Phase~II efficacy failures, so anticipating which programmes will advance would let sponsors back the hypotheses most likely to reach patients. What a programme…
When and How Much to Imagine: Adaptive Test-Time Scaling with World Models for Visual Spatial Reasoning
Despite rapid progress in MLLMs, visual spatial reasoning remains unreliable when correct answers depend on how a scene would appear under unseen or alternative viewpoints. Recent work addresses this by augmenting reason…
Spatial ReasoningCompute Aligned Training: Optimizing for Test Time Inference
Scaling test-time compute has emerged as a powerful mechanism for enhancing Large Language Model (LLM) performance. However, standard post-training paradigms, Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL),…
Reinforcement LearningClaim-Selective Certification for High-Risk Medical Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Medical RAG systems in high-risk QA settings are often evaluated through a single answer-or-abstain decision, but mixed evidence may support one claim, require conditions for another, and contradict a third. We study cla…