paper-with-me

Papers

Efficient Agentic Reasoning Through Self-Regulated Simulative Planning

2026-05-21 · Mingkai Deng, Jinyu Hou, Lara Sá Neves, Varad Pimpalkhute, Taylor W. Killian, Zhengzhong Liu, Eric P. Xing arxiv

How should an agent decide when and how to plan? A dominant approach builds agents as reactive policies with adaptive computation (e.g., chain-of-thought), trained end-to-end expecting planning to emerge implicitly. Without control over the presence, structure, or horizon of planning, these systems dramatically increase reasoning length, yielding inefficient token use without reliable accuracy gains. We argue efficient agentic reasoning benefits from decomposing decision-making into three systems: simulative reasoning (System II) grounding deliberation in future-state prediction via a world model; self-regulation (System III) deciding when and how deeply to plan via a learned configurator; and reactive execution (System I) handling fine-grained action. Simulative reasoning provides unified planning across diverse tasks without per-domain engineering, while self-regulation ensures the planner is invoked only when needed. To test this, we develop SR$^2$AM (Self-Regulated Simulative Reasoning Agentic LLM), realizing both as distinct stages within an LLM's chain-of-thought, with the LLM as world model. We explore two instantiations: recording decisions from a prompted multi-module system (v0.1) and reconstructing structured plans from traces of pretrained reasoning LLMs (v1.0), trained via supervised then reinforcement learning (RL). Across math, science, tabular analysis, and web information seeking, v0.1-8B and v1.0-30B achieve Pass@1 competitive with 120-355B and 685B-1T parameter systems respectively, while v1.0-30B uses 25.8-95.3% fewer reasoning tokens than comparable agentic LLMs. RL increases average planning horizon by 22.8% while planning frequency grows only 2.0%, showing it learns to plan further ahead rather than more often. More broadly, learned self-regulation instantiates a principle we expect to extend beyond planning to how agents govern their own learning and adaptation.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.22138

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Reinforcement Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

General Agentic Planning Through Simulative Reasoning with World Models

2025-07-31 · Mingkai Deng, Jinyu Hou, Zhiting Hu, Eric Xing arxiv

What does it mean to plan? Current agentic systems, whether scaffolded workflows or end-to-end policies, rely on reactive decision-making: selecting the next action via a fixed procedure with at most undifferentiated ada…

Instruction Following

Agentic AI for Commercial Insurance Underwriting with Adversarial Self-Critique

2026-01-21 · Joyjit Roy, Samaresh Kumar Singh arxiv

Commercial insurance underwriting is a labor-intensive process that requires manual review of extensive documentation to assess risk and determine policy pricing. While AI offers substantial efficiency improvements, exis…

Critique of Agent Model

2026-06-22 · Eric Xing, Mingkai Deng, Jinyu Hou arxiv

What is an agent? What constitutes agency? With the rise of Large Language Model (LLM) systems marketed as ``coding agents'', ``AI co-scientists'', and other ``agentic" tools that promise to drive up productivity, and at…

Intelligence as Managed Autonomy: Failure, Escalation, and Governance for Agentic AI Systems

2026-05-26 · Srini Ramaswamy arxiv

As autonomous and agentic AI systems scale in robotic and human-machine environments, managing hallucination and persistent but unjustified action remains an open challenge. Rather than attributing these failures solely …

Yes FLoReNce, I Will Do Better Next Time! Agentic Feedback Reasoning for Humorous Meme Detection

2026-01-12 · Olivia Shanhong Liu, Pai Chet Ng, De Wen Soh, Konstantinos N. Plataniotis arxiv

Humorous memes blend visual and textual cues to convey irony, satire, or social commentary, posing unique challenges for AI systems that must interpret intent rather than surface correlations. Existing multimodal or prom…