paper-with-me

Papers

On Transferability of Bias Mitigation Effects in Language Model Fine-Tuning

2020-10-24 · NAACL 2021 4 · Xisen Jin, Francesco Barbieri, Brendan Kennedy, Aida Mostafazadeh Davani, Leonardo Neves, Xiang Ren

Fine-tuned language models have been shown to exhibit biases against protected groups in a host of modeling tasks such as text classification and coreference resolution. Previous works focus on detecting these biases, reducing bias in data representations, and using auxiliary training objectives to mitigate bias during fine-tuning. Although these techniques achieve bias reduction for the task and domain at hand, the effects of bias mitigation may not directly transfer to new tasks, requiring additional data collection and customized annotation of sensitive attributes, and re-evaluation of appropriate fairness metrics. We explore the feasibility and benefits of upstream bias mitigation (UBM) for reducing bias on downstream tasks, by first applying bias mitigation to an upstream model through fine-tuning and subsequently using it for downstream fine-tuning. We find, in extensive experiments across hate speech detection, toxicity detection, occupation prediction, and coreference resolution tasks over various bias factors, that the effects of UBM are indeed transferable to new downstream tasks or domains via fine-tuning, creating less biased downstream models than directly fine-tuning on the downstream task or transferring from a vanilla upstream model. Though challenges remain, we show that UBM promises more efficient and accessible bias mitigation in LM fine-tuning.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2010.12864

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

coreference-resolutionCoreference ResolutionFairnessHate Speech DetectionLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingOccupation predictiontext-classificationText ClassificationTransfer Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

From Measurement to Mitigation: Exploring the Transferability of Debiasing Approaches to Gender Bias in Maltese Language Models

2025-07-03 · Melanie Galea, Claudia Borg arxiv

The advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has transformed Natural Language Processing (NLP), enabling performance across diverse tasks with little task-specific training. However, LLMs remain susceptible to social …

Data Augmentation

ViD: Vision-Dominant Gender Bias Mitigation for Large Vision-Language Models

2026-09-15 · Zhipeng Zhao, Zhaoqiang Wei, Peishun Liu, Youwei Zhao 외 arxiv

Gender bias in large vision-language models (LVLMs) undermines their fairness and reliability, compromising output trustworthiness. Current mitigation methods rely on training-phase adjustments or post-hoc calibration, b…

Visual GroundingImage CaptioningText Generation

Explaining Knock-on Effects of Bias Mitigation

2023-12-01 · Svetoslav Nizhnichenkov, Rahul Nair, Elizabeth Daly, Brian Mac Namee

In machine learning systems, bias mitigation approaches aim to make outcomes fairer across privileged and unprivileged groups. Bias mitigation methods work in different ways and have known "waterfall" effects, e.g., miti…

Fairness

How Far Can It Go?: On Intrinsic Gender Bias Mitigation for Text Classification

2023-01-30 · Ewoenam Tokpo, Pieter Delobelle, Bettina Berendt, Toon Calders

To mitigate gender bias in contextualized language models, different intrinsic mitigation strategies have been proposed, alongside many bias metrics. Considering that the end use of these language models is for downstrea…

Fairnesstext-classificationText Classification

No Free Lunch in Language Model Bias Mitigation? Targeted Bias Reduction Can Exacerbate Unmitigated LLM Biases

2025-11-23 · Shireen Chand, Faith Baca, Emilio Ferrara arxiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) inherit societal biases from their training data, potentially leading to harmful or unfair outputs. While various techniques aim to mitigate these biases, their effects are often evaluated on…