Employing Argumentation Knowledge Graphs for Neural Argument Generation
Generating high-quality arguments, while being challenging, may benefit a wide range of downstream applications, such as writing assistants and argument search engines. Motivated by the effectiveness of utilizing knowledge graphs for supporting general text generation tasks, this paper investigates the usage of argumentation-related knowledge graphs to control the generation of arguments. In particular, we construct and populate three knowledge graphs, employing several compositions of them to encode various knowledge into texts of debate portals and relevant paragraphs from Wikipedia. Then, the texts with the encoded knowledge are used to fine-tune a pre-trained text generation model, GPT-2. We evaluate the newly created arguments manually and automatically, based on several dimensions important in argumentative contexts, including argumentativeness and plausibility. The results demonstrate the positive impact of encoding the graphs{'} knowledge into debate portal texts for generating arguments with superior quality than those generated without knowledge.
Code (1)
Tasks
Knowledge GraphsText GenerationMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
First Workshop on Argumentation Knowledge Graphs
First Workshop on Argumentation Knowledge Graphs
Knowledge GraphsImproving Quality Assessment of Online Reviews UsingFormal Argumentation Theory and Knowledge Graphs
In this extended abstract, we introduce a previously developed framework for the assessment of the quality of product reviews by using formal argumentation theory and machine learning. Then, we outline current developme…
BIG-bench Machine LearningKnowledge GraphsEnd-to-end argumentation knowledge graph construction
This paper studies the end-to-end construction of an argumentation knowledge graph that is intended to support argument synthesis, argumentative question answering, or fake news detection, among others. The study is moti…
16kFake News Detectiongraph constructionKnowledge Graphs+2Aggregation in Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks
Value-based argumentation enhances a classical abstract argumentation graph - in which arguments are modelled as nodes connected by directed arrows called attacks - with labels on arguments, called values, and an orderin…
Abstract ArgumentationInterpreting Neural Networks as Gradual Argumentation Frameworks (Including Proof Appendix)
We show that an interesting class of feed-forward neural networks can be understood as quantitative argumentation frameworks. This connection creates a bridge between research in Formal Argumentation and Machine Learning…
BIG-bench Machine Learning