paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Equal Improvability: A New Fairness Notion Considering the Long-term Impact

2022-10-13 · Ozgur Guldogan, Yuchen Zeng, Jy-yong Sohn, Ramtin Pedarsani, Kangwook Lee

Devising a fair classifier that does not discriminate against different groups is an important problem in machine learning. Although researchers have proposed various ways of defining group fairness, most of them only focused on the immediate fairness, ignoring the long-term impact of a fair classifier under the dynamic scenario where each individual can improve its feature over time. Such dynamic scenarios happen in real world, e.g., college admission and credit loaning, where each rejected sample makes effort to change its features to get accepted afterwards. In this dynamic setting, the long-term fairness should equalize the samples' feature distribution across different groups after the rejected samples make some effort to improve. In order to promote long-term fairness, we propose a new fairness notion called Equal Improvability (EI), which equalizes the potential acceptance rate of the rejected samples across different groups assuming a bounded level of effort will be spent by each rejected sample. We analyze the properties of EI and its connections with existing fairness notions. To find a classifier that satisfies the EI requirement, we propose and study three different approaches that solve EI-regularized optimization problems. Through experiments on both synthetic and real datasets, we demonstrate that the proposed EI-regularized algorithms encourage us to find a fair classifier in terms of EI. Finally, we provide experimental results on dynamic scenarios which highlight the advantages of our EI metric in achieving the long-term fairness. Codes are available in a GitHub repository, see https://github.com/guldoganozgur/ei_fairness.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2210.06732

Code (1)

guldoganozgur/ei_fairness 공식 구현 pytorch

Tasks

Fairness

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Welfare, Improvability, and Variance: A Principal-Agent Approach to Optimal Benchmark Item Aggregation

2026-05-29 · Andreas Haupt, Justin Hartenstein, Anka Reuel, Mykel Kochenderfer 외 arxiv

AI benchmarks have well-documented limitations, with prior work examining contamination, saturation, and construct underspecification. Aggregation has received far less attention: benchmarks are typically summarized by u…

Towards Equalised Odds as Fairness Metric in Academic Performance Prediction

2022-09-29 · Jannik Dunkelau, Manh Khoi Duong

The literature for fairness-aware machine learning knows a plethora of different fairness notions. It is however wellknown, that it is impossible to satisfy all of them, as certain notions contradict each other. In this …

Fairness

Dynamic fairness - Breaking vicious cycles in automatic decision making

2019-02-01 · Benjamin Paaßen, Astrid Bunge, Carolin Hainke, Leon Sindelar 외

In recent years, machine learning techniques have been increasingly applied in sensitive decision making processes, raising fairness concerns. Past research has shown that machine learning may reproduce and even exacerba…

BIG-bench Machine LearningDecision MakingFairness

Identifiability of Causal-based Fairness Notions: A State of the Art

2022-03-11 · Karima Makhlouf, Sami Zhioua, Catuscia Palamidessi

Machine learning algorithms can produce biased outcome/prediction, typically, against minorities and under-represented sub-populations. Therefore, fairness is emerging as an important requirement for the large scale appl…

BIG-bench Machine LearningCausal InferencecounterfactualFairness

What Hides behind Unfairness? Exploring Dynamics Fairness in Reinforcement Learning

2024-04-16 · Zhihong Deng, Jing Jiang, Guodong Long, Chengqi Zhang

In sequential decision-making problems involving sensitive attributes like race and gender, reinforcement learning (RL) agents must carefully consider long-term fairness while maximizing returns. Recent works have propos…

AttributecounterfactualDecision MakingFairness+4