Estimating Multi-label Accuracy using Labelset Distributions
A multi-label classifier estimates the binary label state (relevant vs irrelevant) for each of a set of concept labels, for any given instance. Probabilistic multi-label classifiers provide a predictive posterior distribution over all possible labelset combinations of such label states (the powerset of labels) from which we can provide the best estimate, simply by selecting the labelset corresponding to the largest expected accuracy, over that distribution. For example, in maximizing exact match accuracy, we provide the mode of the distribution. But how does this relate to the confidence we may have in such an estimate? Confidence is an important element of real-world applications of multi-label classifiers (as in machine learning in general) and is an important ingredient in explainability and interpretability. However, it is not obvious how to provide confidence in the multi-label context and relating to a particular accuracy metric, and nor is it clear how to provide a confidence which correlates well with the expected accuracy, which would be most valuable in real-world decision making. In this article we estimate the expected accuracy as a surrogate for confidence, for a given accuracy metric. We hypothesise that the expected accuracy can be estimated from the multi-label predictive distribution. We examine seven candidate functions for their ability to estimate expected accuracy from the predictive distribution. We found three of these to correlate to expected accuracy and are robust. Further, we determined that each candidate function can be used separately to estimate Hamming similarity, but a combination of the candidates was best for expected Jaccard index and exact match.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Decision MakingSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Nearest Labelset Using Double Distances for Multi-label Classification
Multi-label classification is a type of supervised learning where an instance may belong to multiple labels simultaneously. Predicting each label independently has been criticized for not exploiting any correlation betwe…
ClassificationGeneral ClassificationMulti-Label ClassificationMUlTI-LABEL-ClASSIFICATIONLearning Improved Representations by Transferring Incomplete Evidence Across Heterogeneous Tasks
Acquiring ground truth labels for unlabelled data can be a costly procedure, since it often requires manual labour that is error-prone. Consequently, the available amount of labelled data is increasingly reduced due to t…
Representation LearningLEDGAR: A Large-Scale Multi-label Corpus for Text Classification of Legal Provisions in Contracts
We present LEDGAR, a multilabel corpus of legal provisions in contracts. The corpus was crawled and scraped from the public domain (SEC filings) and is, to the best of our knowledge, the first freely available corpus of …
General Classificationtext-classificationText ClassificationStudent Performance Prediction with Optimum Multilabel Ensemble Model
One of the important measures of quality of education is the performance of students in the academic settings. Nowadays, abundant data is stored in educational institutions about students which can help to discover insig…
General ClassificationmodelMulti-class ClassificationMulti-Label Classification+3Ensemble Methods for Multi-label Classification
Ensemble methods have been shown to be an effective tool for solving multi-label classification tasks. In the RAndom k-labELsets (RAKEL) algorithm, each member of the ensemble is associated with a small randomly-selected…
ClassificationGeneral ClassificationMulti-Label ClassificationMUlTI-LABEL-ClASSIFICATION