Estimating Treatment Effects using Multiple Surrogates: The Role of the Surrogate Score and the Surrogate Index
Estimating the long-term effects of treatments is of interest in many fields. A common challenge in estimating such treatment effects is that long-term outcomes are unobserved in the time frame needed to make policy decisions. One approach to overcome this missing data problem is to analyze treatments effects on an intermediate outcome, often called a statistical surrogate, if it satisfies the condition that treatment and outcome are independent conditional on the statistical surrogate. The validity of the surrogacy condition is often controversial. Here we exploit that fact that in modern datasets, researchers often observe a large number, possibly hundreds or thousands, of intermediate outcomes, thought to lie on or close to the causal chain between the treatment and the long-term outcome of interest. Even if none of the individual proxies satisfies the statistical surrogacy criterion by itself, using multiple proxies can be useful in causal inference. We focus primarily on a setting with two samples, an experimental sample containing data about the treatment indicator and the surrogates and an observational sample containing information about the surrogates and the primary outcome. We state assumptions under which the average treatment effect be identified and estimated with a high-dimensional vector of proxies that collectively satisfy the surrogacy assumption, and derive the bias from violations of the surrogacy assumption, and show that even if the primary outcome is also observed in the experimental sample, there is still information to be gained from using surrogates.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Causal InferenceSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Continuous Treatment Effects with Surrogate Outcomes
In many real-world causal inference applications, the primary outcomes (labels) are often partially missing, especially if they are expensive or difficult to collect. If the missingness depends on covariates (i.e., missi…
Causal InferenceSelection biasOn the role of surrogates in the efficient estimation of treatment effects with limited outcome data
In many experimental and observational studies, the outcome of interest is often difficult or expensive to observe, reducing effective sample sizes for estimating average treatment effects (ATEs) even when identifiable. …
MarketingA New Causal Rule Learning Approach to Interpretable Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effect
Interpretability plays a critical role in the application of statistical learning for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) for complex diseases. In this study, we leverage a rule-based workflow, namely causal…
DescriptiveRandom Forests of Interaction Trees for Estimating Individualized Treatment Effects in Randomized Trials
Assessing heterogeneous treatment effects has become a growing interest in advancing precision medicine. Individualized treatment effects (ITE) play a critical role in such an endeavor. Concerning experimental data colle…
Estimating Treatment Effects in Continuous Time with Hidden Confounders
Estimating treatment effects plays a crucial role in causal inference, having many real-world applications like policy analysis and decision making. Nevertheless, estimating treatment effects in the longitudinal setting …
Causal InferenceDecision MakingIrregular Time SeriesTime Series Analysis