paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Estimation of Fair Ranking Metrics with Incomplete Judgments

2021-08-11 · Ömer Kırnap, Fernando Diaz, Asia Biega, Michael Ekstrand, Ben Carterette, Emine Yilmaz

There is increasing attention to evaluating the fairness of search system ranking decisions. These metrics often consider the membership of items to particular groups, often identified using protected attributes such as gender or ethnicity. To date, these metrics typically assume the availability and completeness of protected attribute labels of items. However, the protected attributes of individuals are rarely present, limiting the application of fair ranking metrics in large scale systems. In order to address this problem, we propose a sampling strategy and estimation technique for four fair ranking metrics. We formulate a robust and unbiased estimator which can operate even with very limited number of labeled items. We evaluate our approach using both simulated and real world data. Our experimental results demonstrate that our method can estimate this family of fair ranking metrics and provides a robust, reliable alternative to exhaustive or random data annotation.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2108.05152

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

AttributeFairness

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Fairness of Exposure in Light of Incomplete Exposure Estimation

2022-05-25 · Maria Heuss, Fatemeh Sarvi, Maarten de Rijke

Fairness of exposure is a commonly used notion of fairness for ranking systems. It is based on the idea that all items or item groups should get exposure proportional to the merit of the item or the collective merit of t…

Fairness

A fairness-aware extension of Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis for ranking

2026-06-16 · Guilherme Dean Pelegrina, Renata Pelissari arxiv

Fairness has become a central concern in ranking problems involving individuals or social groups, particularly under the Responsible Artificial Intelligence agenda. In Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Stochastic Multicr…

Source-Free MT Evaluation Is Not MT Evaluation

2026-08-21 · Baban Gain, Ramakrishna Appicharla, Asif Ekbal arxiv

Reference-based metrics remain the standard choice in machine translation evaluation, partly because quality estimation methods often correlate less well with human judgments. As a result, source-free, reference-based ev…

Machine Translation

Data-Driven Relevance Judgments for Ranking Evaluation

2016-12-19 · Moniz Nuno, Torgo Luís, Vinagre João

Ranking evaluation metrics are a fundamental element of design and improvement efforts in information retrieval. We observe that most popular metrics disregard information portrayed in the scores used to derive rankings,…

Information RetrievalRetrieval

Guardians of the Machine Translation Meta-Evaluation: Sentinel Metrics Fall In!

2024-08-25 · Stefano Perrella, Lorenzo Proietti, Alessandro Scirè, Edoardo Barba 외

Annually, at the Conference of Machine Translation (WMT), the Metrics Shared Task organizers conduct the meta-evaluation of Machine Translation (MT) metrics, ranking them according to their correlation with human judgmen…

FairnessMachine TranslationTranslation