EuroCon: Benchmarking Parliament Deliberation for Political Consensus Finding
Achieving political consensus is crucial yet challenging for the effective functioning of social governance. However, although frontier AI systems represented by large language models (LLMs) have developed rapidly in recent years, their capabilities on this scope are still understudied. In this paper, we introduce EuroCon, a novel benchmark constructed from 2,225 high-quality deliberation records of the European Parliament over 13 years, ranging from 2009 to 2022, to evaluate the ability of LLMs to reach political consensus among divergent party positions across diverse parliament settings. Specifically, EuroCon incorporates four factors to build each simulated parliament setting: specific political issues, political goals, participating parties, and power structures based on seat distribution. We also develop an evaluation framework for EuroCon to simulate real voting outcomes in different parliament settings, assessing whether LLM-generated resolutions meet predefined political goals. Our experimental results demonstrate that even state-of-the-art models remain undersatisfied with complex tasks like passing resolutions by a two-thirds majority and addressing security issues, while revealing some common strategies LLMs use to find consensus under different power structures, such as prioritizing the stance of the dominant party, highlighting EuroCon's promise as an effective platform for studying LLMs' ability to find political consensus.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
BenchmarkingSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
ParliaBench: An Evaluation and Benchmarking Framework for LLM-Generated Parliamentary Speech
Parliamentary speech generation presents specific challenges for large language models beyond standard text generation tasks. Unlike general text generation, parliamentary speeches require not only linguistic quality but…
Text GenerationWho Speaks Matters: Authority-Aware Multi-View RAG over Italian Parliamentary Proceedings
Parliamentary proceedings are a primary record of democratic deliberation, yet their volume and fragmentation make multi-perspective access difficult for citizens, journalists, and researchers. Applying Retrieval-Augment…
Benchmarking Gender and Political Bias in Large Language Models
We introduce EuroParlVote, a novel benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in politically sensitive contexts. It links European Parliament debate speeches to roll-call vote outcomes and includes rich demogr…
Epistemic orientation in parliamentary discourse is associated with deliberative democracy
The pursuit of truth is central to democratic deliberation and governance, yet political discourse reflects varying epistemic orientations, ranging from evidence-based reasoning grounded in verifiable information to intu…
Semantic SimilarityUnveiling the Political Agenda of the European Parliament Plenary: A Topical Analysis
This study analyzes political interactions in the European Parliament (EP) by considering how the political agenda of the plenary sessions has evolved over time and the manner in which Members of the European Parliament …
Dynamic Topic Modeling