paper-with-me

Papers

Evaluating AI systems under uncertain ground truth: a case study in dermatology

2023-07-05 · David Stutz, Ali Taylan Cemgil, Abhijit Guha Roy, Tatiana Matejovicova, Melih Barsbey, Patricia Strachan, Mike Schaekermann, Jan Freyberg, Rajeev Rikhye, Beverly Freeman, Javier Perez Matos, Umesh Telang, Dale R. Webster, YuAn Liu, Greg S. Corrado, Yossi Matias, Pushmeet Kohli, Yun Liu, Arnaud Doucet, Alan Karthikesalingam

For safety, medical AI systems undergo thorough evaluations before deployment, validating their predictions against a ground truth which is assumed to be fixed and certain. However, this ground truth is often curated in the form of differential diagnoses. While a single differential diagnosis reflects the uncertainty in one expert assessment, multiple experts introduce another layer of uncertainty through disagreement. Both forms of uncertainty are ignored in standard evaluation which aggregates these differential diagnoses to a single label. In this paper, we show that ignoring uncertainty leads to overly optimistic estimates of model performance, therefore underestimating risk associated with particular diagnostic decisions. To this end, we propose a statistical aggregation approach, where we infer a distribution on probabilities of underlying medical condition candidates themselves, based on observed annotations. This formulation naturally accounts for the potential disagreements between different experts, as well as uncertainty stemming from individual differential diagnoses, capturing the entire ground truth uncertainty. Our approach boils down to generating multiple samples of medical condition probabilities, then evaluating and averaging performance metrics based on these sampled probabilities. In skin condition classification, we find that a large portion of the dataset exhibits significant ground truth uncertainty and standard evaluation severely over-estimates performance without providing uncertainty estimates. In contrast, our framework provides uncertainty estimates on common metrics of interest such as top-k accuracy and average overlap, showing that performance can change multiple percentage points. We conclude that, while assuming a crisp ground truth can be acceptable for many AI applications, a more nuanced evaluation protocol should be utilized in medical diagnosis.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2307.02191

Code (1)

google-deepmind/uncertain_ground_truth 공식 구현 jax

Tasks

DiagnosticMedical Diagnosis

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

IRN 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

On the Hardness of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: Optimal Learners and Information-Theoretic Perspective

2025-07-09 · Zhiyi Dong, Zixuan Liu, Yongyi Mao arxiv

This paper studies the hardness of unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) under covariate shift. We model the uncertainty that the learner faces by a distribution $π$ in the ground-truth triples $(p, q, f)$ -- which we cal…

Unsupervised Domain Adaptation

The Illusion of AI Expertise Under Uncertainty: Navigating Elusive Ground Truth via a Probabilistic Paradigm

2026-01-09 · Aparna Elangovan, Lei Xu, Mahsa Elyasi, Ismail Akdulum 외 arxiv

Benchmarking the capabilities of AI systems, including Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision Models, typically ignores the impact of uncertainty in the underlying ground truth answers from experts. This ambiguity is no…

Be Careful When Evaluating Explanations Regarding Ground Truth

2023-11-08 · Hubert Baniecki, Maciej Chrabaszcz, Andreas Holzinger, Bastian Pfeifer 외

Evaluating explanations of image classifiers regarding ground truth, e.g. segmentation masks defined by human perception, primarily evaluates the quality of the models under consideration rather than the explanation meth…

Medical Image Analysis

From Propagation to Prediction: Point-level Uncertainty Evaluation of MLS Point Clouds under Limited Ground Truth

2025-11-04 · Ziyang Xu, Olaf Wysocki, Christoph Holst arxiv

Evaluating uncertainty is critical for reliable use of Mobile Laser Scanning (MLS) point clouds in many high-precision applications such as Scan-to-BIM, deformation analysis, and 3D modeling. However, obtaining the groun…

Point Clouds

A Judge-Aware Ranking Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models without Ground Truth

2026-01-29 · Mingyuan Xu, Xinzi Tan, Jiawei Wu, Doudou Zhou arxiv

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) on open-ended tasks without ground-truth labels is increasingly done via the LLM-as-a-judge paradigm. A critical but under-modeled issue is that judge LLMs differ substantially in …