paper-with-me

Papers

Evaluating Cross-lingual Knowledge Consistency in Code-Mixed vis-a-vis Indian Languages using IndicKLAR

2026-05-28 · Debajyoti Mazumder, Divyansh Pathak, Prashant Kodali, Aditya Joshi, Akshay Agarwal, Jasabanta Patro arxiv

Large language models recall knowledge reliably in English but often fail on the same query posed in a lower-resourced language -- a crosslingual consistency gap that remains underexplored for Indian languages and their code-mixed counterparts. To study this gap, we introduce IndiKLAR, an Indic extension of the KLAR-CLC benchmark covering 18 of the 22 scheduled Indian languages and pairing them with code-mixed variants for 11 widely used language pairs, with native-speaker verification of both monolingual and code-mixed variants for these 11 settings. This three-way alignment offers a unique opportunity to examine how knowledge recall consistency varies across the spectrum of English, code-mixed, and native Indian language inputs. Evaluating across nine open-weight models, we find that the native-language accuracy gap to English can reach $\sim$0.50, while code-mixed inputs close most of it -- bringing performance within $\sim$0.05 of English without any model-level intervention. Motivated by this, we evaluate several prompting strategies that vary in how language conversion is exposed, including a two-stage translate-then-answer setup, a one-stage joint translation-and-answer prompt, and Translate-in-Thought (TinT) -- a single-step strategy in which the model converts the input internally and emits only the final answer. Across the performance trajectory native $\rightarrow$ code-mixed $\rightarrow$ English, we identify a consistent flip point -- the boundary between incorrect and correct prediction -- that lies between the native and code-mixed settings. Interestingly, this holds whether the trajectory is induced by the input surface form or by the model's internal conversion process.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.29637

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Speaker Verification

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Are Knowledge and Reference in Multilingual Language Models Cross-Lingually Consistent?

2025-07-17 · Xi Ai, Mahardika Krisna Ihsani, Min-Yen Kan arxiv

Cross-lingual consistency should be considered to assess cross-lingual transferability, maintain the factuality of the model knowledge across languages, and preserve the parity of language model performance. We are thus …

Word Alignment

Evaluating Knowledge-based Cross-lingual Inconsistency in Large Language Models

2024-07-01 · Xiaolin Xing, Zhiwei He, Haoyu Xu, Xing Wang 외

This paper investigates the cross-lingual inconsistencies observed in Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, Llama, and Baichuan, which have shown exceptional performance in various Natural Language Processing (N…

Not Truly Multilingual: Script Consistency as a Missing Dimension in VLM Evaluation

2026-06-15 · Prabhjot Singh, Bhushan Pawar, Madhu Reddiboina, Rajvee Sheth arxiv

Current multilingual evaluations for Vision-Language Models (VLMs) assume a one-to-one mapping between language and orthography, overlooking billions of users of multi-script languages. We introduce PuMVR (Punjabi Multim…

Visual Reasoning

Lost in Multilinguality: Dissecting Cross-lingual Factual Inconsistency in Transformer Language Models

2025-04-05 · Mingyang Wang, Heike Adel, Lukas Lange, Yihong Liu 외

Multilingual language models (MLMs) store factual knowledge across languages but often struggle to provide consistent responses to semantically equivalent prompts in different languages. While previous studies point out …

Found in Translation: Measuring Multilingual LLM Consistency as Simple as Translate then Evaluate

2025-05-28 · Ashim Gupta, Maitrey Mehta, Zhichao Xu, Vivek Srikumar

Large language models (LLMs) provide detailed and impressive responses to queries in English. However, are they really consistent at responding to the same query in other languages? The popular way of evaluating for mult…

Benchmarking