Evaluating Factuality in Generation with Dependency-level Entailment
Despite significant progress in text generation models, a serious limitation is their tendency to produce text that is factually inconsistent with information in the input. Recent work has studied whether textual entailment systems can be used to identify factual errors; however, these sentence-level entailment models are trained to solve a different problem than generation filtering and they do not localize which part of a generation is non-factual. In this paper, we propose a new formulation of entailment that decomposes it at the level of dependency arcs. Rather than focusing on aggregate decisions, we instead ask whether the semantic relationship manifested by individual dependency arcs in the generated output is supported by the input. Human judgments on this task are difficult to obtain; we therefore propose a method to automatically create data based on existing entailment or paraphrase corpora. Experiments show that our dependency arc entailment model trained on this data can identify factual inconsistencies in paraphrasing and summarization better than sentence-level methods or those based on question generation, while additionally localizing the erroneous parts of the generation.
Code (1)
Tasks
ARCNatural Language InferenceQuestion GenerationQuestion-GenerationSentenceText GenerationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
FactGraph: Evaluating Factuality in Summarization with Semantic Graph Representations
Despite recent improvements in abstractive summarization, most current approaches generate summaries that are not factually consistent with the source document, severely restricting their trust and usage in real-world ap…
Abstractive Text SummarizationARCPlainQAFact: Automatic Factuality Evaluation Metric for Biomedical Plain Language Summaries Generation
Hallucinated outputs from language models pose risks in the medical domain, especially for lay audiences making health-related decisions. Existing factuality evaluation methods, such as entailment- and question-answering…
Question AnsweringGO FIGURE: A Meta Evaluation of Factuality in Summarization
While neural language models can generate text with remarkable fluency and coherence, controlling for factual correctness in generation remains an open research question. This major discrepancy between the surface-level …
Common Sense ReasoningDiagnosticDocument SummarizationText GenerationAMRFact: Enhancing Summarization Factuality Evaluation with AMR-Driven Negative Samples Generation
Ensuring factual consistency is crucial for natural language generation tasks, particularly in abstractive summarization, where preserving the integrity of information is paramount. Prior works on evaluating factual cons…
Abstractive Text SummarizationNatural Language InferenceText GenerationRevisiting text decomposition methods for NLI-based factuality scoring of summaries
Scoring the factuality of a generated summary involves measuring the degree to which a target text contains factual information using the input document as support. Given the similarities in the problem formulation, prev…
Natural Language InferenceSentence