paper-with-me

Papers

Evaluating Scholarly Impact: Towards Content-Aware Bibliometrics

2021-11-01 · EMNLP 2021 11 · Saurav Manchanda, George Karypis

Quantitatively measuring the impact-related aspects of scientific, engineering, and technological (SET) innovations is a fundamental problem with broad applications. Traditional citation-based measures for assessing the impact of innovations and related entities do not take into account the content of the publications. This limits their ability to provide rigorous quality-related metrics because they cannot account for the reasons that led to a citation. We present approaches to estimate content-aware bibliometrics to quantitatively measure the scholarly impact of a publication. Our approaches assess the impact of a cited publication by the extent to which the cited publication informs the citing publication. We introduce a new metric, called “Content Informed Index” (CII), that uses the content of the paper as a source of distant-supervision, to quantify how much the cited-node informs the citing-node. We evaluate the weights estimated by our approach on three manually annotated datasets, where the annotations quantify the extent of information in the citation. Particularly, we evaluate how well the ranking imposed by our approach associates with the ranking imposed by the manual annotations. CII achieves up to 103% improvement in performance as compared to the second-best performing approach.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX

Code (1)

gurdaspuriya/evaluating-scholarly-impact 공식 구현

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Unleashing the Power of AI. A Systematic Review of Cutting-Edge Techniques in AI-Enhanced Scientometrics, Webometrics, and Bibliometrics

2024-02-22 · Hamid Reza Saeidnia, Elaheh Hosseini, Shadi Abdoli, Marcel Ausloos

Purpose: The study aims to analyze the synergy of Artificial Intelligence (AI), with scientometrics, webometrics, and bibliometrics to unlock and to emphasize the potential of the applications and benefits of AI algorith…

ArticlesRecommendation SystemsSystematic Literature Review

Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards

2025-01-30 · Haejin Lee, Shubhanshu Mishra, Apratim Mishra, Zhiwen You 외

Gender biases in scholarly metrics remain a persistent concern, despite numerous bibliometric studies exploring their presence and absence across productivity, impact, acknowledgment, and self-citations. However, methodo…

Using Bibliometrics to Detect Unconventional Authorship Practices and Examine Their Impact on Global Research Metrics, 2019-2023

2024-07-07 · Lokman I. Meho, Elie A. Akl

Between 2019 and 2023, sixteen universities increased their research output by over fifteen times the global average, alongside significant changes in authorship dynamics (e.g., decreased first authorship, rise in hyperp…

How are journals cited? characterizing journal citations by type of citation

2021-02-22 · Domenic Rosati

Evaluation of journals for quality is one of the dominant themes of bibliometrics since journals are the primary venue of vetting and distribution of scholarship. There are many criticisms of quantifying journal impact w…

Information RetrievalRetrievalVocal Bursts Type Prediction

Bibliometric-enhanced Information Retrieval: 2nd International BIR Workshop

2015-01-12 · Mayr Philipp, Frommholz Ingo, Scharnhorst Andrea, Mutschke Peter

This workshop brings together experts of communities which often have been perceived as different once: bibliometrics / scientometrics / informetrics on the one side and information retrieval on the other. Our motivation…

Information RetrievalRetrievalTransfer Learning