paper-with-me

Papers

Evaluating Test-Time Scaling LLMs for Legal Reasoning: OpenAI o1, DeepSeek-R1, and Beyond

2025-03-20 · Yaoyao Yu, Leilei Gan, Yinghao Hu, Bin Wei, Kun Kuang, Fei Wu

Recently, Test-Time Scaling Large Language Models (LLMs), such as DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI o1, have demonstrated exceptional capabilities across various domains and tasks, particularly in reasoning. While these models have shown impressive performance on general language tasks, their effectiveness in specialized fields like legal remains unclear. To address this, we present a preliminary evaluation of LLMs in various legal scenarios, covering both Chinese and English legal tasks. Our analysis includes 9 LLMs and 17 legal tasks, with a focus on newly published and more complex challenges such as multi-defendant legal judgments and legal argument reasoning. Our findings indicate that, despite DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI o1 being among the most powerful models, their legal reasoning capabilities are still lacking. Specifically, these models score below 80\% on seven Chinese legal reasoning tasks and below 80\% on two English legal reasoning tasks. This suggests that, even among the most advanced reasoning models, legal reasoning abilities remain underdeveloped.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2503.16040

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Legal Reasoning

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Focus 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Evaluating the Role of Verifiers in Test-Time Scaling for Legal Reasoning Tasks

2025-10-29 · Davide Romano, Jonathan Schwarz, Daniele Giofré arxiv

Test-time scaling (TTS) techniques can improve the performance of large language models (LLMs) at the expense of additional computation and latency. While TTS has proven effective in formal domains such as mathematics an…

Legal Reasoning

UA-Legal-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Ukrainian Legal Reasoning

2026-05-27 · Volodymyr Ovcharov arxiv

Legal NLP benchmarks are overwhelmingly English-centric, leaving failure modes in morphologically rich, non-Latin-script languages undetected. We introduce UA-Legal-Bench, a five-task benchmark for evaluating large langu…

Legal Reasoning

LexRubric: A Rubric-Guided Diagnostic Benchmark for Open-Ended Legal Tasks

2026-06-08 · Yifan Chen, Haitao Li, Yiran Hu, Kaisong Song 외 arxiv

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to real-world legal tasks, evaluating the reliability of their open-ended legal responses has become essential. These tasks require context-sensitive answers and a…

Legal Reasoning

Automatic Legal Writing Evaluation of LLMs

2025-04-29 · Ramon Pires, Roseval Malaquias Junior, Rodrigo Nogueira

Despite the recent advances in Large Language Models, benchmarks for evaluating legal writing remain scarce due to the inherent complexity of assessing open-ended responses in this domain. One of the key challenges in ev…

Rethinking Agentic Workflows: Evaluating Inference-Based Test-Time Scaling Strategies in Text2SQL Tasks

2025-10-13 · Jiajing Guo, Kenil Patel, Jorge Piazentin Ono, Wenbin He 외 arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly powering Text-to-SQL (Text2SQL) systems, enabling non-expert users to query industrial databases using natural language. While test-time scaling strategies have shown promise…