paper-with-me

Papers

Expander Sparse Autoencoders: Parameter-Efficient Dictionaries for Mechanistic Interpretability

2026-07-02 · Rodrigo Mendoza-Smith arxiv

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) decompose internal activations of neural networks into sparse linear combinations of learned features by fitting an overcomplete dictionary $\mathbf{W}\in\mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$ with $m<n$, and inferring a sparse code $\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^n$ from $\mathbf{h}\approx\mathbf{W}\mathbf{x}$. This inference problem closely resembles the canonical setup of compressed sensing, but dense decoders requires $O(mn)$ learned values, which becomes costly at large feature counts. We introduce Expander SAEs: TopK SAEs whose decoder and tied encoder are supported on a left-$d$-regular expander mask with $d\ll m$, learning only $dn$ decoder values while keeping the sparse-coding problem $(m,n,k)$ fixed. The same structure reduces storage and turns the matching-pursuit correlation step $\mathbf{W}^\top \mathbf{r}$ in OMP into an $O(dn)$ gather-and-reduce operation. Our experiments show that across Pythia-70M/160M, Qwen2.5-3B, and Llama-3.2-1B residual-stream activations, varying $d$ traces a consistent storage--fidelity frontier, and that at the most compressed modern-LM setting, Qwen2.5-3B with $d=7$ uses $293\times$ fewer learned decoder values than the full dense decoder while retaining $84$% of dense CE-loss recovered. Control experiments show that the improved storage--fidelity tradeoff is driven by sparse, diverse decoder support structure rather than by fewer learned decoder values, and that when sparse and dense decoders are compared at matched parameter count, part of the remaining gap comes from encoder amortisation. On the theoretical side, we show that expansion and column flatness are sufficient for identifiability of noiseless $k$-sparse codes, and we derive complementary sufficient conditions under which OMP recovers the support exactly.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2607.01799

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Circuits, Features, and Heuristics in Molecular Transformers

2025-12-10 · Kristof Varadi, Mark Marosi, Peter Antal arxiv

Transformers generate valid and diverse chemical structures, but little is known about the mechanisms that enable these models to capture the rules of molecular representation. We present a mechanistic analysis of autore…

Mechanistic Interpretability of EEG Foundation Models via Sparse Autoencoders

2026-05-13 · William Lehn-Schiøler, Magnus Ruud Kjær, Rahul Thapa, Magnus Guldberg Pedersen 외 arxiv

EEG foundation models achieve state-of-the-art clinical performance, yet the internal computations driving their predictions remain opaque: a barrier to clinical trust. We apply TopK Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) across thr…

Sparse Autoencoders Reveal Interpretable and Steerable Features in VLA Models

2026-03-19 · Aiden Swann, Lachlain McGranahan, Hugo Buurmeijer, Monroe Kennedy 외 arxiv

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have emerged as a promising approach for general-purpose robot manipulation. However, little research has mechanistically explored when and why they generalize across objects, scenes, …

Robot Manipulation

What Cohort INRs Encode and Where to Freeze Them

2026-05-08 · Vasiliki Sideri-Lampretsa, Sophie Starck, Robbie Holland, Julian McGinnis 외 arxiv

Reusing the early layers of cohort-trained INRs as initialization for new signals has been shown to accelerate and improve signal fitting, yet it remains unclear which layers of the shared encoder learn transferable repr…

Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoders

2025-03-21 · Bart Bussmann, Noa Nabeshima, Adam Karvonen, Neel Nanda

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a powerful tool for interpreting neural networks by extracting the concepts represented in their activations. However, choosing the size of the SAE dictionary (i.e. number of le…