paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Explainable artificial intelligence toward usable and trustworthy computer-aided early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis from Optical Coherence Tomography

2023-02-13 · Monica Hernandez, Ubaldo Ramon-Julvez, Elisa Vilades, Beatriz Cordon, Elvira Mayordomo, Elena Garcia-Martin

Background: Several studies indicate that the anterior visual pathway provides information about the dynamics of axonal degeneration in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Current research in the field is focused on the quest for the most discriminative features among patients and controls and the development of machine learning models that yield computer-aided solutions widely usable in clinical practice. However, most studies are conducted with small samples and the models are used as black boxes. Clinicians should not trust machine learning decisions unless they come with comprehensive and easily understandable explanations. Materials and methods: A total of 216 eyes from 111 healthy controls and 100 eyes from 59 patients with relapsing-remitting MS were enrolled. The feature set was obtained from the thickness of the ganglion cell layer (GCL) and the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL). Measurements were acquired by the novel Posterior Pole protocol from Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) device. We compared two black-box methods (gradient boosting and random forests) with a glass-box method (explainable boosting machine). Explainability was studied using SHAP for the black-box methods and the scores of the glass-box method. Results: The best-performing models were obtained for the GCL layer. Explainability pointed out to the temporal location of the GCL layer that is usually broken or thinning in MS and the relationship between low thickness values and high probability of MS, which is coherent with clinical knowledge. Conclusions: The insights on how to use explainability shown in this work represent a first important step toward a trustworthy computer-aided solution for the diagnosis of MS with OCT.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2302.06613

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Clinical KnowledgeExplainable artificial intelligence

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

SHAP 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

CONFIDERAI: a novel CONFormal Interpretable-by-Design score function for Explainable and Reliable Artificial Intelligence

2023-09-04 · Sara Narteni, Alberto Carlevaro, Fabrizio Dabbene, Marco Muselli 외

Everyday life is increasingly influenced by artificial intelligence, and there is no question that machine learning algorithms must be designed to be reliable and trustworthy for everyone. Specifically, computer scientis…

Conformal PredictionDisease PredictionFairness

Artificial Intelligence/Operations Research Workshop 2 Report Out

2023-04-10 · John Dickerson, Bistra Dilkina, Yu Ding, Swati Gupta 외

This workshop Report Out focuses on the foundational elements of trustworthy AI and OR technology, and how to ensure all AI and OR systems implement these elements in their system designs. Four sessions on various topics…

Fairness

The role of explainability in creating trustworthy artificial intelligence for health care: a comprehensive survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategies

2020-07-31 · Aniek F. Markus, Jan A. Kors, Peter R. Rijnbeek

Artificial intelligence (AI) has huge potential to improve the health and well-being of people, but adoption in clinical practice is still limited. Lack of transparency is identified as one of the main barriers to implem…

Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy

2020-02-10 · Ben Shneiderman

Well-designed technologies that offer high levels of human control and high levels of computer automation can increase human performance, leading to wider adoption. The Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) frame…

Justifiable Artificial Intelligence: Engineering Large Language Models for Legal Applications

2023-11-27 · Sabine Wehnert

In this work, I discuss how Large Language Models can be applied in the legal domain, circumventing their current drawbacks. Despite their large success and acceptance, their lack of explainability hinders legal experts …

Explainable artificial intelligenceMisinformation