paper-with-me

Papers

Explaining Random Forests using Bipolar Argumentation and Markov Networks (Technical Report)

2022-11-21 · Nico Potyka, Xiang Yin, Francesca Toni

Random forests are decision tree ensembles that can be used to solve a variety of machine learning problems. However, as the number of trees and their individual size can be large, their decision making process is often incomprehensible. In order to reason about the decision process, we propose representing it as an argumentation problem. We generalize sufficient and necessary argumentative explanations using a Markov network encoding, discuss the relevance of these explanations and establish relationships to families of abductive explanations from the literature. As the complexity of the explanation problems is high, we discuss a probabilistic approximation algorithm and present first experimental results.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2211.11699

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Decision Making

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Argument Attribution Explanations in Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (Technical Report)

2023-07-25 · Xiang Yin, Nico Potyka, Francesca Toni

Argumentative explainable AI has been advocated by several in recent years, with an increasing interest on explaining the reasoning outcomes of Argumentation Frameworks (AFs). While there is a considerable body of resear…

Fake News DetectionRecommendation Systems

ArgRAG: Explainable Retrieval Augmented Generation using Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation

2025-08-26 · Yuqicheng Zhu, Nico Potyka, Daniel Hernández, Yuan He 외 arxiv

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances large language models by incorporating external knowledge, yet suffers from critical limitations in high-stakes domains -- namely, sensitivity to noisy or contradictory evide…

Fact Verification

Change in Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation: Sufficient, Necessary, and Counterfactual Explanations

2025-09-21 · Timotheus Kampik, Kristijonas Čyras, José Ruiz Alarcón arxiv

This paper presents a formal approach to explaining change of inference in Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (QBAFs). When drawing conclusions from a QBAF and updating the QBAF to then again draw conclusions …

CE-QArg: Counterfactual Explanations for Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (Technical Report)

2024-07-11 · Xiang Yin, Nico Potyka, Francesca Toni

There is a growing interest in understanding arguments' strength in Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (QBAFs). Most existing studies focus on attribution-based methods that explain an argument's strength by a…

counterfactualvalid

Complexity Results and Algorithms for Bipolar Argumentation

2019-03-05 · Amin Karamlou, Kristijonas Čyras, Francesca Toni

Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs) admit several interpretations of the support relation and diverging definitions of semantics. Recently, several classes of BAFs have been captured as instances of bipolar Assumptio…