Explanation-Aware Learning for Enhanced Interpretability in Biomedical Imaging
Deep neural networks for medical image diagnosis often achieve high predictive accuracy while relying on spurious or clinically irrelevant visual cues, limiting their trustworthiness in practice. Post-hoc explanation methods are widely used to visualize model decisions in the form of saliency maps; however, these explanations do not influence how models learn during training, allowing non-causal or confounding features to persist. This motivates the incorporation of explanation supervision directly into the training objective to guide model attention toward clinically meaningful regions and promote clinically grounded decision-making. This paper presents a systematic approach to integrate explanation loss into model training and analyzes how different explanation loss designs and supervision strengths influence both predictive performance and spatial faithfulness of explanations. To quantitatively assess interpretability, two complementary explanation performance metrics-annotation coverage and saliency precision-are introduced, enabling rigorous evaluation beyond qualitative visualization. Our experimental results reveal a clear trade-off between explanation quality and explanation loss coefficients. Furthermore, quantitative statistical analysis yields consistently improved explanation alignment while maintaining comparable accuracy. Experiments were conducted on annotated chest X-ray datasets; however, the proposed framework is applicable to a broad range of annotated biomedical imaging modalities. Overall, these findings demonstrate that explanation supervision is not a monolithic design choice and provide practical guidance for incorporating explanation loss into training objectives under noisy clinical annotations.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Towards Visually Explaining Statistical Tests with Applications in Biomedical Imaging
Deep neural two-sample tests have recently shown strong power for detecting distributional differences between groups, yet their black-box nature limits interpretability and practical adoption in biomedical analysis. Mor…
Explaining Black-box Models for Biomedical Text Classification
In this paper, we propose a novel method named Biomedical Confident Itemsets Explanation (BioCIE), aiming at post-hoc explanation of black-box machine learning models for biomedical text classification. Using sources of …
ClassificationGeneral Classificationtext-classificationText ClassificationSAIL: Structure-Aware Interpretable Learning for Anatomy-Aligned Post-hoc Explanations in OCT
Optical coherence tomography (OCT), a commonly used retinal imaging modality, plays a central role in retinal disease diagnosis by providing high-resolution visualization of retinal layers. While deep learning (DL) has a…
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Image Analysis: A Comprehensive Survey
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has become increasingly important in biomedical image analysis to promote transparency, trust, and clinical adoption of DL models. While several surveys have reviewed XAI techniq…
Explainable artificial intelligenceExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)SurveyPHAX: A Structured Argumentation Framework for User-Centered Explainable AI in Public Health and Biomedical Sciences
Ensuring transparency and trust in AI-driven public health and biomedical sciences systems requires more than accurate predictions-it demands explanations that are clear, contextual, and socially accountable. While expla…