LIMEADE: From AI Explanations to Advice Taking
Research in human-centered AI has shown the benefits of systems that can explain their predictions. Methods that allow an AI to take advice from humans in response to explanations are similarly useful. While both capabilities are well-developed for transparent learning models (e.g., linear models and GA$^2$Ms), and recent techniques (e.g., LIME and SHAP) can generate explanations for opaque models, little attention has been given to advice methods for opaque models. This paper introduces LIMEADE, the first general framework that translates both positive and negative advice (expressed using high-level vocabulary such as that employed by post-hoc explanations) into an update to an arbitrary, underlying opaque model. We demonstrate the generality of our approach with case studies on seventy real-world models across two broad domains: image classification and text recommendation. We show our method improves accuracy compared to a rigorous baseline on the image classification domains. For the text modality, we apply our framework to a neural recommender system for scientific papers on a public website; our user study shows that our framework leads to significantly higher perceived user control, trust, and satisfaction.
Code (1)
Tasks
BIG-bench Machine Learningimage-classificationImage ClassificationRecommendation SystemsMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice: Conceptualization and the Effect of Explanations
AI advice is becoming increasingly popular, e.g., in investment and medical treatment decisions. As this advice is typically imperfect, decision-makers have to exert discretion as to whether actually follow that advice: …
The Impact of Imperfect XAI on Human-AI Decision-Making
Explainability techniques are rapidly being developed to improve human-AI decision-making across various cooperative work settings. Consequently, previous research has evaluated how decision-makers collaborate with imper…
Decision MakingExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)ADESSE: Advice Explanations in Complex Repeated Decision-Making Environments
In the evolving landscape of human-centered AI, fostering a synergistic relationship between humans and AI agents in decision-making processes stands as a paramount challenge. This work considers a problem setup where an…
Decision MakingDeep Reinforcement LearningExplainable AI and Adoption of Financial Algorithmic Advisors: an Experimental Study
We study whether receiving advice from either a human or algorithmic advisor, accompanied by five types of Local and Global explanation labelings, has an effect on the readiness to adopt, willingness to pay, and trust in…
Decision MakingExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)How Performance Pressure Influences AI-Assisted Decision Making
Many domains now employ AI-based decision-making aids, and although the potential for AI systems to assist with decision making is much discussed, human-AI collaboration often underperforms due to factors such as (mis)tr…
Decision Making