Exploiting Representation Bias for Data Distillation in Abstractive Text Summarization
Abstractive text summarization is surging with the number of training samples to cater to the needs of the deep learning models. These models tend to exploit the training data representations to attain superior performance by improving the quantitative element of the resultant summary. However, increasing the size of the training set may not always be the ideal solution to maximize the performance, and therefore, a need to revisit the quality of training samples and the learning protocol of deep learning models is a must. In this paper, we aim to discretize the vector space of the abstractive text summarization models to understand the characteristics learned between the input embedding space and the models' encoder space. We show that deep models fail to capture the diversity of the input space. Further, the distribution of data points on the encoder space indicates that an unchecked increase in the training samples does not add value; rather, a tear-down of data samples is highly needed to make the models focus on variability and faithfulness. We employ clustering techniques to learn the diversity of a model's sample space and how data points are mapped from the embedding space to the encoder space and vice versa. Further, we devise a metric to filter out redundant data points to make the model more robust and less data hungry. We benchmark our proposed method using quantitative metrics, such as Rouge, and qualitative metrics, such as BERTScore, FEQA and Pyramid score. We also quantify the reasons that inhibit the models from learning the diversity from the varied input samples.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Abstractive Text SummarizationDiversityText SummarizationMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Attacks against Abstractive Text Summarization Models through Lead Bias and Influence Functions
Large Language Models have introduced novel opportunities for text comprehension and generation. Yet, they are vulnerable to adversarial perturbations and data poisoning attacks, particularly in tasks like text classific…
Abstractive Text SummarizationAdversarial RobustnessData PoisoningReading Comprehension+3Enhancing Abstractiveness of Summarization Models through Calibrated Distillation
Sequence-level knowledge distillation reduces the size of Seq2Seq models for more efficient abstractive summarization. However, it often leads to a loss of abstractiveness in summarization. In this paper, we propose a no…
Abstractive Text SummarizationInformativenessKnowledge DistillationReliability Gated Multi-Teacher Distillation for Low Resource Abstractive Summarization
We study multiteacher knowledge distillation for low resource abstractive summarization from a reliability aware perspective. We introduce EWAD (Entropy Weighted Agreement Aware Distillation), a token level mechanism tha…
Knowledge DistillationSemantic SimilarityAlleviating Exposure Bias via Multi-level Contrastive Learning and Deviation Simulation in Abstractive Summarization
Most Transformer based abstractive summarization systems have a severe mismatch between training and inference, i.e., exposure bias. From diverse perspectives, we introduce a simple multi-level contrastive learning frame…
Abstractive Text SummarizationContrastive LearningDecoderFew-Shot LearningAttention Temperature Matters in Abstractive Summarization Distillation
Recent progress of abstractive text summarization largely relies on large pre-trained sequence-to-sequence Transformer models, which are computationally expensive. This paper aims to distill these large models into small…
Abstractive Text SummarizationText Summarization