paper-with-me

Papers

Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHF

2024-05-31 · Tengyang Xie, Dylan J. Foster, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Corby Rosset, Ahmed Awadallah, Alexander Rakhlin

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a central tool for language model alignment. We consider online exploration in RLHF, which exploits interactive access to human or AI feedback by deliberately encouraging the model to produce diverse, maximally informative responses. By allowing RLHF to confidently stray from the pre-trained model, online exploration offers the possibility of novel, potentially super-human capabilities, but its full potential as a paradigm for language model training has yet to be realized, owing to computational and statistical bottlenecks in directly adapting existing reinforcement learning techniques. We propose a new algorithm for online exploration in RLHF, Exploratory Preference Optimization (XPO), which is simple and practical -- a one-line change to (online) Direct Preference Optimization (DPO; Rafailov et al., 2023) -- yet enjoys the strongest known provable guarantees and promising empirical performance. XPO augments the DPO objective with a novel and principled exploration bonus, empowering the algorithm to explore outside the support of the initial model and human feedback data. In theory, we show that XPO is provably sample-efficient and converges to a near-optimal language model policy under natural exploration conditions, irrespective of whether the initial model has good coverage. Our analysis, which builds on the observation that DPO implicitly performs a form of $Q^{\star}$-approximation (or, Bellman error minimization), combines previously disparate techniques from language modeling and theoretical reinforcement learning in a serendipitous fashion through the perspective of KL-regularized Markov decision processes. Empirically, we find that XPO is more sample-efficient than non-exploratory DPO variants in a preliminary evaluation.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2405.21046

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Language ModelingLanguage Modellingreinforcement-learningReinforcement Learning

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

DPO 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Policy Optimization in RLHF: The Impact of Out-of-preference Data

2023-12-17 · Ziniu Li, Tian Xu, Yang Yu

Aligning intelligent agents with human preferences and values is important. This paper examines two popular alignment methods: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Reward-Model-Based Policy Optimization (RMB-PO). A v…

Contrastive Learning from Exploratory Actions: Leveraging Natural Interactions for Preference Elicitation

2025-01-02 · Nathaniel Dennler, Stefanos Nikolaidis, Maja Matarić

People have a variety of preferences for how robots behave. To understand and reason about these preferences, robots aim to learn a reward function that describes how aligned robot behaviors are with a user's preferences…

Contrastive Learning

Offline Preference Optimization via Maximum Marginal Likelihood Estimation

2025-10-27 · Saeed Najafi, Alona Fyshe arxiv

Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences is crucial, but standard methods like Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) are often complex and unstable. In this work, we propose a new, simpler…

Reinforcement Learning

Pairwise Proximal Policy Optimization: Harnessing Relative Feedback for LLM Alignment

2023-09-30 · Tianhao Wu, Banghua Zhu, Ruoyu Zhang, Zhaojin Wen 외

Large Language Models (LLMs) can acquire extensive world knowledge through pre-training on large corpora. However, due to exposure to low-quality data, LLMs may exhibit harmful behavior without aligning with human values…

reinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningWorld Knowledge

Efficient Exploration for Iterative Nash Preference Optimization

2026-05-31 · Tianlong Nan, Xiaopeng Li, Christian Kroer, Tianyi Lin arxiv

Preference alignment is central to improving large language models, but standard reward-based formulations can be restrictive when human preferences are cyclic, non-transitive, or otherwise not representable by a scalar …