Exploring Rawlsian Fairness for K-Means Clustering
We conduct an exploratory study that looks at incorporating John Rawls' ideas on fairness into existing unsupervised machine learning algorithms. Our focus is on the task of clustering, specifically the k-means clustering algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that uses Rawlsian ideas in clustering. Towards this, we attempt to develop a postprocessing technique i.e., one that operates on the cluster assignment generated by the standard k-means clustering algorithm. Our technique perturbs this assignment over a number of iterations to make it fairer according to Rawls' difference principle while minimally affecting the overall utility. As the first step, we consider two simple perturbation operators -- $\mathbf{R_1}$ and $\mathbf{R_2}$ -- that reassign examples in a given cluster assignment to new clusters; $\mathbf{R_1}$ assigning a single example to a new cluster, and $\mathbf{R_2}$ a pair of examples to new clusters. Our experiments on a sample of the Adult dataset demonstrate that both operators make meaningful perturbations in the cluster assignment towards incorporating Rawls' difference principle, with $\mathbf{R_2}$ being more efficient than $\mathbf{R_1}$ in terms of the number of iterations. However, we observe that there is still a need to design operators that make significantly better perturbations. Nevertheless, both operators provide good baselines for designing and comparing any future operator, and we hope our findings would aid future work in this direction.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
ClusteringFairnessMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Operationalising Rawlsian Ethics for Fairness in Norm-Learning Agents
Social norms are standards of behaviour common in a society. However, when agents make decisions without considering how others are impacted, norms can emerge that lead to the subjugation of certain agents. We present RA…
Decision MakingEthicsFairnessFrom Utilitarian to Rawlsian Designs for Algorithmic Fairness
There is a lack of consensus within the literature as to how `fairness' of algorithmic systems can be measured, and different metrics can often be at odds. In this paper, we approach this task by drawing on the ethical f…
FairnessWelfare-Centric Clustering
Fair clustering has traditionally focused on ensuring equitable group representation or equalizing group-specific clustering costs. However, Dickerson et al. (2025) recently showed that these fairness notions may yield u…
A Computational Approach to Improving Fairness in K-means Clustering
The popular K-means clustering algorithm potentially suffers from a major weakness for further analysis or interpretation. Some cluster may have disproportionately more (or fewer) points from one of the subpopulations in…
ClusteringFairnessTowards Harmless Rawlsian Fairness Regardless of Demographic Prior
Due to privacy and security concerns, recent advancements in group fairness advocate for model training regardless of demographic information. However, most methods still require prior knowledge of demographics. In this …
Fairness