Expressing High-Level Scientific Claims with Formal Semantics
The use of semantic technologies is gaining significant traction in science communication with a wide array of applications in disciplines including the Life Sciences, Computer Science, and the Social Sciences. Languages like RDF, OWL, and other formalisms based on formal logic are applied to make scientific knowledge accessible not only to human readers but also to automated systems. These approaches have mostly focused on the structure of scientific publications themselves, on the used scientific methods and equipment, or on the structure of the used datasets. The core claims or hypotheses of scientific work have only been covered in a shallow manner, such as by linking mentioned entities to established identifiers. In this research, we therefore want to find out whether we can use existing semantic formalisms to fully express the content of high-level scientific claims using formal semantics in a systematic way. Analyzing the main claims from a sample of scientific articles from all disciplines, we find that their semantics are more complex than what a straight-forward application of formalisms like RDF or OWL account for, but we managed to elicit a clear semantic pattern which we call the 'super-pattern'. We show here how the instantiation of the five slots of this super-pattern leads to a strictly defined statement in higher-order logic. We successfully applied this super-pattern to an enlarged sample of scientific claims. We show that knowledge representation experts, when instructed to independently instantiate the super-pattern with given scientific claims, show a high degree of consistency and convergence given the complexity of the task and the subject. These results therefore open the door for expressing high-level scientific findings in a manner they can be automatically interpreted, which on the longer run can allow us to do automated consistency checking, and much more.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
ArticlesFormal LogicVocal Bursts Intensity PredictionSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Nanopublication-Based Semantic Publishing and Reviewing: A Field Study with Formalization Papers
With the rapidly increasing amount of scientific literature,it is getting continuously more difficult for researchers in different disciplines to be updated with the recent findings in their field of study.Processing sci…
ArticlesFormal LogicCheck-COVID: Fact-Checking COVID-19 News Claims with Scientific Evidence
We present a new fact-checking benchmark, Check-COVID, that requires systems to verify claims about COVID-19 from news using evidence from scientific articles. This approach to fact-checking is particularly challenging a…
ArticlesFact CheckingSentenceCan Scientific Claims Be Removed from Large Language Models? A Systematic Evaluation of Claim-Level Unlearning
Language models (LMs) are trained on static scientific corpora, whereas scientific knowledge continuously evolves through correction and revision. Scientific claims encoded within these models may later become retracted,…
WarrantScore: Modeling Warrants between Claims and Evidence for Substantiation Evaluation in Peer Reviews
The scientific peer-review process is facing a shortage of human resources due to the rapid growth in the number of submitted papers. The use of language models to reduce the human cost of peer review has been actively e…
COVID-Fact: Fact Extraction and Verification of Real-World Claims on COVID-19 Pandemic
We introduce a FEVER-like dataset COVID-Fact of $4,086$ claims concerning the COVID-19 pandemic. The dataset contains claims, evidence for the claims, and contradictory claims refuted by the evidence. Unlike previous app…
ArticlesMisinformation