paper-with-me

Papers

Fair and Argumentative Language Modeling for Computational Argumentation

2022-04-08 · ACL 2022 5 · Carolin Holtermann, Anne Lauscher, Simone Paolo Ponzetto

Although much work in NLP has focused on measuring and mitigating stereotypical bias in semantic spaces, research addressing bias in computational argumentation is still in its infancy. In this paper, we address this research gap and conduct a thorough investigation of bias in argumentative language models. To this end, we introduce ABBA, a novel resource for bias measurement specifically tailored to argumentation. We employ our resource to assess the effect of argumentative fine-tuning and debiasing on the intrinsic bias found in transformer-based language models using a lightweight adapter-based approach that is more sustainable and parameter-efficient than full fine-tuning. Finally, we analyze the potential impact of language model debiasing on the performance in argument quality prediction, a downstream task of computational argumentation. Our results show that we are able to successfully and sustainably remove bias in general and argumentative language models while preserving (and sometimes improving) model performance in downstream tasks. We make all experimental code and data available at https://github.com/umanlp/FairArgumentativeLM.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2204.04026

Code (1)

umanlp/fairargumentativelm 공식 구현

Tasks

Language ModelingLanguage Modelling

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Computational Argumentation Synthesis as a Language Modeling Task

2019-10-01 · WS 2019 10 · Roxanne El Baff, Henning Wachsmuth, Khalid Al Khatib, Manfred Stede 외

Synthesis approaches in computational argumentation so far are restricted to generating claim-like argument units or short summaries of debates. Ultimately, however, we expect computers to generate whole new arguments fo…

Language ModelingLanguage Modelling

Assessing Open-Source Large Language Models on Argumentation Mining Subtasks

2024-11-08 · Mohammad Yeghaneh Abkenar, Weixing Wang, Hendrik Graupner, Manfred Stede

We explore the capability of four open-sourcelarge language models (LLMs) in argumentation mining (AM). We conduct experiments on three different corpora; persuasive essays(PE), argumentative microtexts (AMT) Part 1 and …

ARCRelation Classification

The Impact of Modeling Overall Argumentation with Tree Kernels

2017-09-01 · EMNLP 2017 9 · Henning Wachsmuth, Giovanni Da San Martino, Dora Kiesel, Benno Stein

Several approaches have been proposed to model either the explicit sequential structure of an argumentative text or its implicit hierarchical structure. So far, the adequacy of these models of overall argumentation remai…

General Classificationtext-classificationText Classification

Argumentative Debates for Transparent Bias Detection [Technical Report]

2025-08-06 · Hamed Ayoobi, Nico Potyka, Anna Rapberger, Francesca Toni arxiv

As the use of AI in society grows, addressing emerging biases is essential to prevent systematic discrimination. Several bias detection methods have been proposed, but, with few exceptions, these tend to ignore transpare…

Bias Detection

Argumentative Human-AI Decision-Making: Toward AI Agents That Reason With Us, Not For Us

2026-03-16 · Stylianos Loukas Vasileiou, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni, William Yeoh arxiv

Computational argumentation offers formal frameworks for transparent, verifiable reasoning but has traditionally been limited by its reliance on domain-specific information and extensive feature engineering. In contrast,…

Feature Engineering