Fair Classification with Group-Dependent Label Noise
This work examines how to train fair classifiers in settings where training labels are corrupted with random noise, and where the error rates of corruption depend both on the label class and on the membership function for a protected subgroup. Heterogeneous label noise models systematic biases towards particular groups when generating annotations. We begin by presenting analytical results which show that naively imposing parity constraints on demographic disparity measures, without accounting for heterogeneous and group-dependent error rates, can decrease both the accuracy and the fairness of the resulting classifier. Our experiments demonstrate these issues arise in practice as well. We address these problems by performing empirical risk minimization with carefully defined surrogate loss functions and surrogate constraints that help avoid the pitfalls introduced by heterogeneous label noise. We provide both theoretical and empirical justifications for the efficacy of our methods. We view our results as an important example of how imposing fairness on biased data sets without proper care can do at least as much harm as it does good.
Code (1)
Tasks
ClassificationFairnessGeneral ClassificationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Leveraging Labeled and Unlabeled Data for Consistent Fair Binary Classification
We study the problem of fair binary classification using the notion of Equal Opportunity. It requires the true positive rate to distribute equally across the sensitive groups. Within this setting we show that the fair op…
Binary ClassificationClassificationFairnessGeneral ClassificationExploring the interplay of label bias with subgroup size and separability: A case study in mammographic density classification
Systematic mislabelling affecting specific subgroups (i.e., label bias) in medical imaging datasets represents an understudied issue concerning the fairness of medical AI systems. In this work, we investigated how size a…
FairDP: Certified Fairness with Differential Privacy
This paper introduces FairDP, a novel training mechanism designed to provide group fairness certification for the trained model's decisions, along with a differential privacy (DP) guarantee to protect training data. The …
FairnessCan Less be More? When Increasing-to-Balancing Label Noise Rates Considered Beneficial
In this paper, we answer the question of when inserting label noise (less informative labels) can instead return us more accurate and fair models. We are primarily inspired by three observations: 1) In contrast to reduci…
FairnessInformativenessLearning with noisy labelsBayes-Optimal Fair Classification with Multiple Sensitive Features
Existing theoretical work on Bayes-optimal fair classifiers usually considers a single (binary) sensitive feature. In practice, individuals are often defined by multiple sensitive features. In this paper, we characterize…
AttributeClassificationFairness