Fair Robust Active Learning by Joint Inconsistency
Fairness and robustness play vital roles in trustworthy machine learning. Observing safety-critical needs in various annotation-expensive vision applications, we introduce a novel learning framework, Fair Robust Active Learning (FRAL), generalizing conventional active learning to fair and adversarial robust scenarios. This framework allows us to achieve standard and robust minimax fairness with limited acquired labels. In FRAL, we then observe existing fairness-aware data selection strategies suffer from either ineffectiveness under severe data imbalance or inefficiency due to huge computations of adversarial training. To address these two problems, we develop a novel Joint INconsistency (JIN) method exploiting prediction inconsistencies between benign and adversarial inputs as well as between standard and robust models. These two inconsistencies can be used to identify potential fairness gains and data imbalance mitigations. Thus, by performing label acquisition with our inconsistency-based ranking metrics, we can alleviate the class imbalance issue and enhance minimax fairness with limited computation. Extensive experiments on diverse datasets and sensitive groups demonstrate that our method obtains the best results in standard and robust fairness under white-box PGD attacks compared with existing active data selection baselines.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Active LearningAdversarial AttackAdversarial RobustnessFairnessSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Addressing Algorithmic Disparity and Performance Inconsistency in Federated Learning
Federated learning (FL) has gain growing interests for its capability of learning from distributed data sources collectively without the need of accessing the raw data samples across different sources. So far FL research…
AllFairnessFederated LearningEquality before the Law: Legal Judgment Consistency Analysis for Fairness
In a legal system, judgment consistency is regarded as one of the most important manifestations of fairness. However, due to the complexity of factual elements that impact sentencing in real-world scenarios, few works ha…
FairnessLLMs on Trial: Evaluating Judicial Fairness for Large Language Models
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in high-stakes fields where their decisions impact rights and equity. However, LLMs' judicial fairness and implications for social justice remain underexplored. When LLM…
A Unified Model for Extractive and Abstractive Summarization using Inconsistency Loss
We propose a unified model combining the strength of extractive and abstractive summarization. On the one hand, a simple extractive model can obtain sentence-level attention with high ROUGE scores but less readable. On th…
Abstractive Text SummarizationSentenceA Unified Model for Extractive and Abstractive Summarization using Inconsistency Loss
We propose a unified model combining the strength of extractive and abstractive summarization. On the one hand, a simple extractive model can obtain sentence-level attention with high ROUGE scores but less readable. On t…
Abstractive Text SummarizationSentence