paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Fairness and Explainability: Bridging the Gap Towards Fair Model Explanations

2022-12-07 · Yuying Zhao, Yu Wang, Tyler Derr

While machine learning models have achieved unprecedented success in real-world applications, they might make biased/unfair decisions for specific demographic groups and hence result in discriminative outcomes. Although research efforts have been devoted to measuring and mitigating bias, they mainly study bias from the result-oriented perspective while neglecting the bias encoded in the decision-making procedure. This results in their inability to capture procedure-oriented bias, which therefore limits the ability to have a fully debiasing method. Fortunately, with the rapid development of explainable machine learning, explanations for predictions are now available to gain insights into the procedure. In this work, we bridge the gap between fairness and explainability by presenting a novel perspective of procedure-oriented fairness based on explanations. We identify the procedure-based bias by measuring the gap of explanation quality between different groups with Ratio-based and Value-based Explanation Fairness. The new metrics further motivate us to design an optimization objective to mitigate the procedure-based bias where we observe that it will also mitigate bias from the prediction. Based on our designed optimization objective, we propose a Comprehensive Fairness Algorithm (CFA), which simultaneously fulfills multiple objectives - improving traditional fairness, satisfying explanation fairness, and maintaining the utility performance. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed CFA and highlight the importance of considering fairness from the explainability perspective. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/YuyingZhao/FairExplanations-CFA .

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2212.03840

Code (1)

yuyingzhao/fairexplanations-cfa 공식 구현 pytorch

Tasks

Decision MakingFairness

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Bridging Fairness and Explainability: Can Input-Based Explanations Promote Fairness in Hate Speech Detection?

2025-09-26 · Yifan Wang, Mayank Jobanputra, Ji-Ung Lee, Soyoung Oh 외 arxiv

Natural language processing (NLP) models often replicate or amplify social bias from training data, raising concerns about fairness. At the same time, their black-box nature makes it difficult for users to recognize bias…

Hate Speech Detection

GESD: Beyond Outcome-Oriented Fairness

2026-05-14 · Gideon Popoola, John Sheppard arxiv

Machine learning (ML) algorithms are increasingly deployed in high-stakes decision-making domains such as loan approvals, hiring, and recidivism predictions. While existing fairness metrics (e.g., statistical parity, equ…

On Explaining Unfairness: An Overview

2024-02-16 · Christos Fragkathoulas, Vasiliki Papanikou, Danae Pla Karidi, Evaggelia Pitoura

Algorithmic fairness and explainability are foundational elements for achieving responsible AI. In this paper, we focus on their interplay, a research area that is recently receiving increasing attention. To this end, we…

Fairness

The Effect of Enforcing Fairness on Reshaping Explanations in Machine Learning Models

2025-12-01 · Joshua Wolff Anderson, Shyam Visweswaran arxiv

Trustworthy machine learning in healthcare requires strong predictive performance, fairness, and explanations. While it is known that improving fairness can affect predictive performance, little is known about how fairne…

Feature Importance

Explainable Fairness in Recommendation

2022-04-24 · Yingqiang Ge, Juntao Tan, Yan Zhu, Yinglong Xia 외

Existing research on fairness-aware recommendation has mainly focused on the quantification of fairness and the development of fair recommendation models, neither of which studies a more substantial problem--identifying …

counterfactualFairnessRecommendation Systems