Fairness for Whom? Critically reframing fairness with Nash Welfare Product
Recent studies on disparate impact in machine learning applications have sparked a debate around the concept of fairness along with attempts to formalize its different criteria. Many of these approaches focus on reducing prediction errors while maximizing sole utility of the institution. This work seeks to reconceptualize and critically frame the existing discourse on fairness by underlining the implicit biases embedded in common understandings of fairness in the literature and how they contrast with its corresponding economic and legal definitions. This paper expands the concept of utility and fairness by bringing in concepts from established literature in welfare economics and game theory. We then translate these concepts for the algorithmic prediction domain by defining a formalization of Nash Welfare Product that seeks to expand utility by collapsing that of the institution using the prediction tool and the individual subject to the prediction into one function. We then apply a modulating function that makes the fairness and welfare trade-offs explicit based on designated policy goals and then apply it to a temporal model to take into account the effects of decisions beyond the scope of one-shot predictions. We apply this on a binary classification problem and present results of a multi-epoch simulation based on the UCI Adult Income dataset and a test case analysis of the ProPublica recidivism dataset that show that expanding the concept of utility results in a fairer distribution correcting for the embedded biases in the dataset without sacrificing the classifier accuracy.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Binary ClassificationFairnessPredictionSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Fairness-Aware Meta-Learning via Nash Bargaining
To address issues of group-level fairness in machine learning, it is natural to adjust model parameters based on specific fairness objectives over a sensitive-attributed validation set. Such an adjustment procedure can b…
Fairnessimage-classificationImage ClassificationMeta-Learning+1The Limits of "Fairness" of the Variational Generalized Nash Equilibrium
Generalized Nash equilibrum (GNE) problems are commonly used to model strategic interactions between self-interested agents who are coupled in cost and constraints. Specifically, the variational GNE, a refinement of the …
FairnessNash Welfare and Facility Location
We consider the problem of locating a facility to serve a set of agents located along a line. The Nash welfare objective function, defined as the product of the agents' utilities, is known to provide a compromise between…
FairnessInteractional Fairness in LLM Multi-Agent Systems: An Evaluation Framework
As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in multi-agent systems, questions of fairness should extend beyond resource distribution and procedural design to include the fairness of how agents communicate. Draw…
FairnessAchieving User-Side Fairness in Contextual Bandits
Personalized recommendation based on multi-arm bandit (MAB) algorithms has shown to lead to high utility and efficiency as it can dynamically adapt the recommendation strategy based on feedback. However, unfairness could…
FairnessMulti-Armed Bandits